Current Events — HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to Wrong

re: Wrong
gbaikie — (archived)

"The appeals were about more than just judicial procedure, but also about facts, findings, conclusions and rights under the law. "

But in the context of did Judge Greer violate any of the above.

Let me give you analogy. If you are stopped 12 times by the police and were not fined, it does not prove that you are doing a good job at driving. Nor does prove you are a bad driver.

That other judges were willing to review the case, does definitely mean they [at least] *had* some concerns about the case which they therefore considered deserved some review.

So your statement: "As for picking judges, 19 judges have concluded that Terri is in a persistent vegetative state and will never recover...19. No judge has come to any other conclusion based upon the evidence. "

In the best of any light, it is irrelevent; in a neutral view it would be misleading; and from my view, it's dishonest OR simply unthinkingly taking the spin from someone else who is dishonest or merely clueless. But I think it is most likely the former due to the way you typically characterize other matters.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (73 posts)