I don't "hate" the courts. I just feel they have acquired too much power lately, and have become arbitrary in nature. This was much more important issue during the election cycles, when courts routinely overrode election laws and imposed arbitrary rulings on things that had been clearly covered by such laws.
In California, this has happened a lot, and not just with election results.
That the same identical law can be considered "constitutional" one year, and "unconstitutional" the next, when not a single word has changed in the Constitution, shows that something's out of whack, and that personalities and politics have overtaken the system.
The pendulum needs to swing back a bit.
Current Events » in reply to "IF she had a living will stating that she didnt want such measures to be taken to keep her alive, would there be this debate?"
For the record...
The whole thread (73 posts)
- The Schiavo tragedy has no business being politicized... (Tom, I am very disappointed with you)
- If you starved a dog to death, you'd go to jail
- And if you had a dog that was permanently crippled...
- re: And if you had a dog that was permanently crippled...
- re: And if you had a dog that was permanently crippled...
- re: And if you had a dog that was permanently crippled...
- Ask your wife to explain Compassionate Care to you (n/t)
- And if you had a dog that was permanently crippled...
- Its a private family matter
- re: The Schiavo tragedy has no business being politicized... (Tom, I am very disappointed with you)
- Why will the husband accept no solution other than her death? Maybe because he promised her.
- re: The Schiavo tragedy has no business being politicized... (Tom, I am very disappointed with you)
- "IF she had a living will stating that she didnt want such measures to be taken to keep her alive, would there be this debate?"
- The real story
- If you starved a dog to death, you'd go to jail
