You cannot effectively fight terrorists, guerillas, or other 'irregulars' with conventional troops or tactics.
To insist that all of our allies increase the percentage of their GNP devoted to the mounting of conventional forces - designed to oppose a threat that no longer exists (the Cold War is over, remember?) is not merely counterproductive, it's stupid - but not as stupid as insisting we have the right to insist.
Remember the Henson show of a few years back, Dinosaurs, and the company Earl Sinclair worked for? I think GW Bush was its CEO before he became ours, because his entire approach to international relations, before as well as after 9/11/2001 has been
We Say So
Current Events » in reply to Re: It remains our business, as much as it remains our allies' . . .
At the risk of reduncancy:
The whole thread (80 posts)
- Canadians lose their minds.
- Why does Canada even have an army?
- Inoperative chestnut
- Re: Why buy aircraft?
- Canadian scizophrenia
- Reposting part of the article you posted so maybe everyone will read it this time
- Something to consider
- That's fine
- Cdn military
- Just saying no
- Re: As a Canadian what you say kinda pisses me off
- Then don't come begging to us for airlift capacity
- Re: Americans spend more on military than any country in the world
- Not even to fight Bushs' war?
- Then don't come begging to us for airlift capacity
