Current Events — HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to Questions, questions, questions

re: Questions, questions, questions
Tom Brosz — (archived)

Why does British Intelligence still insist that the African link is valid, based on information OTHER than the forged documents? Unless they had confidence in this information, what possible motivation could they have for coming out with such a statement in the teeth of this controversy?

Why does the fact that Joseph C. Wilson (the ambassador on whose statements much of this flap rides) is a rampant anti-Bush partisan not get noticed in the media?

Why is the Left hogpiling on such a minor issue? If this piece of data was a mistake, does it automatically invalidate the many other reasons for going to war with Iraq? Should Saddam be restored to power if he didn't try buy uranium from Africa? Is this really all the Left has got in its quiver right now? I can understand why they desperately want an investigation...they've got nothing, and hope something will be dug up.

Rumsfeld spent the weekend in the lion's den, facing reporters who, almost to the last person, came there with a single thought in mind: "What question can I ask that will destroy this man and the Bush administration?" The mainstream media is obsessed with this, and it isn't going to get any easier over the next months.

Rumsfeld on "Meet the Press."

Rumsfeld on ABC with Stephanopoulus.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (63 posts)