The big difference in this bruhaha and the Clinton use of the terms sexual relations and "is" is the fact that that bruhaha over semantics started after Clinton admitted he lied.
It is natural I suppose that those who are in conflict with the Bush presidency ask the questions that you pose but I wonder...
Would Condi agree that she "blamed" Tenet? I don't recall her using that word.
Would Tenet agree that he is "taking a fall"?
Would the CIA agree that they "backtracked"?
If one accepts the Brit's version of the truth, wouldn't the statement be technically true but admittedly incorrect since we relied on different information?
Would Rummy or the UK government agree that he "blamed" the Brits?
If Bush admits he lied. your questions will become a great retrospective.
Current Events » in reply to Questions, questions, questions
Perception, perception, perception
The whole thread (63 posts)
- Questions, questions, questions
- re: Questions, questions, questions
- BTW, did Rumsfeld manage to keep a straight face when saying ....
- re: Questions, questions, questions
- re: Questions, questions, questions
- Spin, spin, spin
- re: Spin, spin, spin
- Blatant misdirection, Tom
- re: Spin, spin, spin
- Logical flaws
- To take a step back...
- Tell the Left, the media, and the Democratic Party to take a step back.
- Again, a misdirection of the debate
- re: Tell the Left, the media, and the Democratic Party to take a step back.
- That's an overly simplistic argument...
- A mistake is not a lie
- Tell the Left, the media, and the Democratic Party to take a step back.
- Several logical flaws
- re: Several logical flaws
- persistent on 2 points.
- Dr L. Nessie rides/swims again...
- Sorry. Real life doesn't work that way.
- re: Several logical flaws
- To take a step back...
- Logical flaws
- re: Spin, spin, spin
- Spin, spin, spin
- re: Questions, questions, questions
- Perception, perception, perception
- re: Questions, questions, questions
