that you lifted your entire post by cut-and-pasting off of the press blog of senator inhofe.
Do you even take pause when you do this and think you just might be whoring your intellect out to politics?
Marlo is not a scientist (does not research at an academic institution, publish in journals, take on grad students, review papers, hold tenure... etc). So you have not met my challenge. Furthermore, it certainly appears that his role as 'fellow' at the 'Competitive Enterprise Institute' is going along just fine- Just drop his name into google. Furthermore, Eckhart is not a climatologist, a climate researcher, an academic or involved in any way in the actual science of climate change. He seems to be some sort of Business Man who retired and turned into some sort of cause junkie.
So lets get this straight- you are sucking this stuff up from Inhofe, who managed to 'package' apacryphal stories of how them evil do-er climate folks are 'crushing the careers' of thos epoor noble skeptical scientists. You don't even check your sources, you don;t even google stuff, you just cut-and-paste it verbatim into posts at me.
And you think I should take you seriously? This is pathetic, I'm not wasting any more time with your post or you. You can't be convinced because you are not in it for the truth, you are in it for your political agenda.
Yeti
Current Events » in reply to re: No, real
It appears
The whole thread (128 posts)
- just the link in text form
- Such high-pitched emotions
- Hansen's latest paper
- re: just the link in text form
- "SourceWatch.org"? Sounds very reputable.
- It's "A Convienient Lie"
- re: It's not just the blogs
- As TB so helpfully pointed out...
- re: Why shouldn’t I believe these scientist?
- re: Why shouldn't I believe these scientist?
- re: Still, there are quite a number of "wait a minute" things out there in the science, work done by real and responsible scientists, and these need to be discussed on a case-by-case basis, not by si…
- I have never claimed that science was a democracy...
- Okay, let's skip to the politics
- It is a political issue
- re: Which facts
- A good place to start
- re: Already seen it
- re: Already seen it
- "What proof is there that CO2 is causing the earth to warm?"
- re: That's not true
- LOL I encourage everyone to look at the link- It really makes my point
- Ummm, ooookaayy... just one thing before I reply
- re: That's not true
- Break it down.
- re: Break it down.
- never mind (n/t)
- re: Break it down.
- We're talking parts per million
- "THe effects on temperature are negligible at best. "- That is nonsense, the science says otherwise...
- No we are not talking parts per million. And anyway, how would you know SteveS' objection till he has voiced it.
- CO2 levels are around 380 ppm (parts per MILLION)
- More used to seeing it as a percent. (n/t)
- CO2 levels are around 380 ppm (parts per MILLION)
- re: Break it down.
- "What proof is there that CO2 is causing the earth to warm?"
- A good place to start
- I have never claimed that science was a democracy...
- re: Still, there are quite a number of "wait a minute" things out there in the science, work done by real and responsible scientists, and these need to be discussed on a case-by-case basis, not by si…
- re: Why shouldn't I believe these scientist?
- Most of those organizations don't put the question to a vote by their members.
- re: Why shouldn’t I believe these scientist?
- That won't work.
- re: It's not just the blogs
- As TB so helpfully pointed out...
- re: It's "A Convienient Lie"
- Global warming.
- "for some reason believe that the issue of Global Warming is a political one"
- re: It's not just the blogs
