You're a lot more comfortable at this level, aren't you?
I notice you're still prancing like a peacock about Peiser, having ignored the later information. You seem to get a little twitchier when people start discussing real science and real scientists.
Any comments on the ideas and scientists mentioned in Steven's earlier posts? Other than the character assassination which, I have noticed, comprises about 80 percent of all arguments against those scientists who have problems with the Current Wisdom?
I also notice you haven't really provided any serious comment on the Gerlich paper other than climbing a tree and throwing poop. I personally have never seen this paper before, and have no opinion on it one way or another.