If I had been able to sock away just half of what I've dumped into taxes over my working life, I wouldn't need to worry about retirement or losing my job. This is probably true for most middle-class people. But then if I provided for myself, where's the power for the government?
And yes, I'm aware that tax money goes into other things besides wealth redistribution. I think I mentioned that in my post. Some of them (damn few) are even legitimate Constitutional government functions. Heck, for local stuff I have even voted FOR local taxes sometimes. I don't mind paying taxes as much if I can look in on my money from time to time.
But at last count, about 55 percent of our Federal budget--about 1.16 trillion dollars--is mandatory entitlements. This doesn't even count all the welfare programs filed under discretionary funding. Doesn't this much money flowing from one group of citizens to others seem a bit high?
Current Events » in reply to That thug at the ATM machine
Re: That thug at the ATM machine
The whole thread (72 posts)
- Bush attacks N Korea leader
- Why should prescription drugs be free?
- Heh, heh.
- Speaking of dense...
- In some eyes - - -
- Re: Charity and force
- The demise of the village
- Re: The demise of generosity
- Re: The demise of generosity
- If charity worked so well, why has the government had to get involved?
- Just an Observation
- Re: Please don't be so unfair to Tom
- Taxes are not an economic elixir...
- Luxury taxes
- "Tinkle down" economics. n/t (n/t)
- Amenities?
- Re: Just an Observation
- Re: Please don't be so unfair to Tom
- Re: The demise of generosity
- Gotta force you.
- The demise of the village
- Re: Charity and force
- In some eyes - - -
- I think I understand your message...
- Speaking of dense...
- Heh, heh.
- Thanks very much
- Re: Bush attacks N Korea leader
- People, Americans, are dying.
- Re: Bush attacks N Korea leader
- Why should prescription drugs be free?
