As your graph shows, sea level did not rise much in the last Century. And the projections by UN indicate some think sea level won't rise much in the next century.
"There are six families of SRES Scenarios, and AR4 provides projected temperature and sea level rises for each scenario family.
* Scenario B1
o Best estimate temperature rise of 1.8 °C with a likely range of 1.1 to 2.9 °C (3.2 °F with a likely range of 2.0 to 5.2 °F)
o Sea level rise likely range [18 to 38 cm] (7 to 15 inches)
* Scenario A1T
o Best estimate temperature rise of 2.4 °C with a likely range of 1.4 to 3.8 °C (4.3 °F with a likely range of 2.5 to 6.8 °F)
o Sea level rise likely range [20 to 45 cm] (8 to 18 inches)
* Scenario B2
o Best estimate temperature rise of 2.4 °C with a likely range of 1.4 to 3.8 °C (4.3 °F with a likely range of 2.5 to 6.8 °F)
o Sea level rise likely range [20 to 43 cm] (8 to 17 inches)
* Scenario A1B
o Best estimate temperature rise of 2.8 °C with a likely range of 1.7 to 4.4 °C (5.0 °F with a likely range of 3.1 to 7.9 °F)
o Sea level rise likely range [21 to 48 cm] (8 to 19 inches)
* Scenario A2
o Best estimate temperature rise of 3.4 °C with a likely range of 2.0 to 5.4 °C (6.1 °F with a likely range of 3.6 to 9.7 °F)
o Sea level rise likely range [23 to 51 cm] (9 to 20 inches)
* Scenario A1FI
o Best estimate temperature rise of 4.0 °C with a likely range of 2.4 to 6.4 °C (7.2 °F with a likely range of 4.3 to 11.5 °F)
o Sea level rise likely range [26 to 59 cm] (10 to 23 inches)"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPCC_Fourth_Assessment_Report
6 Scenarios. It's a certainty that at least 5 will be wrong.
But then again these are just projections, and no one claims they are actually predictions, so perhaps one can also say there isn't a right or wrong- the real point is they gave their best game results.
Flame » in reply to "Sea level have not risen significantly in the last hundred years, nor are they expected to rise much in next hundred years."- where do you get this nonsense?
where do you get this nonsense?
The whole thread (100 posts)
- Scientists Say No to AGW, Sign Petition
- "Unless we announce disasters no one will listen."
- U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007
- New Peer-Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears
- Why do some denialists claim to be environmentalists?
- More on the "petition"
- Greenhouse Gas Hypothesis Violates Fundamentals of Physics
- Hans Schreuder's Letter to EPA
- Sometimes ordinary people get it right, even if they have wierd reasons.
- It is a well-known scientifical fack - - -
- Facts and Fancies
- Who exactly are you trying to fool?
- I certainly am connecting those dots.
- Facts and Fancies
- Who ARE these people?
- re: Who ARE these people?
- A response
- Give Me A Scientific Reason That Increasing A Greenhouse Gas Won't Warm a Planet's Atmosphere
- Photosynthesis
- re: Give Me A Scientific Reason That Increasing A Greenhouse Gas Won't Warm a Planet's Atmosphere
- re: Could you direct me to the experiment?
- Give Me A Scientific Reason That Increasing A Greenhouse Gas Won't Warm a Planet's Atmosphere
- re: Who ARE these people?
- re: Scientists Say No to AGW, Sign Petition
- re: Scientists Say No to AGW, Sign Petition
