There are people who have over time resisted every attempt to restrain greed. Workers compensation, Unions, emissions, are a few. They object to taxes. They resent every domestic program for the less privileged individual and family, while mildly objecting to corporate welfare. If typewriters could wink, that's when we'd see it.
When they object to a developing situation which may have a short-term impact on corporate profits one can safely surmise it is not on the merits, but a knee-jerk submission to their prejudices and ideology. That's a slam dunk. One should not expect anything else.
It is easy to get trapped by people who have suspended reason, logic and rational thinking in favor if ideology. One thinks that if I only explain that turd on the sidewalk well enough the ideologues will have to acknowledge it's crap. One could smell it and show a photo of the dog leaving it. They will blandly it's chocolate ice cream.
A further surprise is how these same people have been absolutely and completely wrong on every issue they've touched and still they argue the next. Enron and WorldCom, as well as the current financial crisis have demonstrated beyond any doubt that unrestrained capitalism does not work. And yet the advocacy for that demonstrated failure continues unabated.
There's more, but it's not necessary. They can argue the next issue without ever apologizing for the last 10 or 15 failures, versus no successes.
There is one thing crazier than an irrational person. That's the person who tries to make sense of them.
Arf
Flame » in reply to re: Who ARE these people?
Bingo.
The whole thread (100 posts)
- Scientists Say No to AGW, Sign Petition
- "Unless we announce disasters no one will listen."
- U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007
- New Peer-Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears
- Why do some denialists claim to be environmentalists?
- More on the "petition"
- Greenhouse Gas Hypothesis Violates Fundamentals of Physics
- Hans Schreuder's Letter to EPA
- Sometimes ordinary people get it right, even if they have wierd reasons.
- It is a well-known scientifical fack - - -
- Facts and Fancies
- Who exactly are you trying to fool?
- I certainly am connecting those dots.
- Facts and Fancies
- Who ARE these people?
- re: Who ARE these people?
- A response
- Give Me A Scientific Reason That Increasing A Greenhouse Gas Won't Warm a Planet's Atmosphere
- Photosynthesis
- re: Give Me A Scientific Reason That Increasing A Greenhouse Gas Won't Warm a Planet's Atmosphere
- re: Could you direct me to the experiment?
- Give Me A Scientific Reason That Increasing A Greenhouse Gas Won't Warm a Planet's Atmosphere
- re: Who ARE these people?
- re: Scientists Say No to AGW, Sign Petition
- re: Scientists Say No to AGW, Sign Petition
