. . . which is that communism wasn't a monolithic scourge sweeping across the globe. In the early Sixties, the Chinese called the Soviets a worse imperialist threat than the West. A communist Vietnam wasn't a threat to the United States.
I'm curious. If you believe the U.S. was justified in murdering and terrorizing communists in other countries, do you think murdering and terrorizing American communists is morally acceptable?
"Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends [i.e., securing inherent and inalienable rights, with powers derived from the consent of the governed], it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness." --Thomas Jefferson: Declaration of Independence, 1776. ME 1:29, Papers 1:315
If you disagree with Jefferson and the principle of self-determination America was founded on, what principle do you advocate in its place?
Current Events » in reply to Read it how you want, but the world was still getting Redder in the 1960's
You seem to be missing my point . . .
The whole thread (88 posts)
- More info on Saddam than I knew, by far.
- Don't you suppose
- Well, everyday is a new day for the average bowwow
- 11 HOURS, ONE CONSERVATIVE SAID HE WOULDN'T WATCH IT, another lied, another said without documentation it's all lies. And that's it.
- Since you are simply accepting a lie as big as the lies about ufs, what do you want? (n/t)
- So why don't you support GWB?
- That's not a bad question.
- re: That's not a bad question.
- raising my hand
- re: raising my hand
- re: raising my hand
- re: raising my hand
- re: raising my hand
- re: raising my hand
- re: That's not a bad question.
- G'morning, little fella. Life treatin' you OK? (n/t)
- raising my hand
- re: That's not a bad question.
- That's not a bad question.
- Don't take it too hard. A good number of people here never actually check out my links, either. (n/t)
- Thank-you everyone for keeping me thinking
- It would be great if that were the issue.
- Look, I'm beginning to see the problem...
- You said before that you anticipated taking a break when politics started getting to you.
- taking a break
- re: You said before that you anticipated taking a break when politics started getting to you.
- PS: For an example of delusion, follow the bouncing 8-ball
- re: PS: For an example of delusion, follow the bouncing 8-ball
- Verisimilar statements versus delusion and a bit on victimization.
- Thank you for calling me "deluded"
- PS: For an example of delusion, follow the bouncing 8-ball
- Welcome to a real, frustrating, world.
- Ayn Rand also said . . .
- re: Look, I'm beginning to see the problem...
- The silent majority read your posts and agree with you, Mr Brosz. Please consider doing your own blog. (n/t)
- For what it's worth...
- You said before that you anticipated taking a break when politics started getting to you.
- Look, I'm beginning to see the problem...
- I don't doubt it.
- In one frame they said he supported terrorists, then in another they said he didn't. Very interesting. (n/t)
- Apparently a flash animation...
- The last text in that peice sent a very uncomfortable chill up my spine... (n/t)
