Actually, I just wanted to prove the regenerative principle of feedback.
The only table where the members seem to be even enjoying themselves less is shared by RL and his brother, Davin who shout incessant insults at the stage as if they are at the Improv.
This admittedly negative and critical comment was interjected into my post. In previous posts I have mentioned how the feedback is often seven times as big as the initial cycle. Your post fits the bill and illustrates this principle.
Tech:
Have you even read the Socratic dialogues? I mean more than just skimmed them scanning for pithy quotes to put up on your website in a vain attempt to sound erudite in matters considered profound. You remind me of Euthyphro. In fact, the shoe fits you so well you should cange your handle here.
Calling you euthyphro might have one benefit: I am sure you will skitter off into the dark corners of the web to read up on the dialogues you offended in an attempt to sound learned. Make sure you read the Phaedo while you are at it, little techie. Make sure you read the homoerotic sections. It is a real Socratic irony that you compared yourself to Socrates.
In general:
You bluster and insult and say really shoddy things about people here all the time, then you stamp a winky face at the bottom of it and claim humor.
Worse: you trot out these really absurd L. Ron Hubbard like philosophies-of-life grounded in this bizarre pseudoscience that has no fact, no empirical basis, no objective review or qualifications. Not just do you trot this out (in front of honest-to-god physicists, mathematicians, engineers and etc), but you want to use it as a platform for bigotry. You want to use your absurd 'metacrap' as a reason to denegrate whole categories of other human beings.
You say homosexuals are degenerate? I say you are far worse of a threat. Your 'choose your own adventure' style of pseudo-intellectualism is not only dishonest, but its immoral in that you try to 'sell' this shit to others as fact. I'm much more worried about your effect on the naive, weak-willed an uneducated than I am about two women or two men loving eachother and wanting to dedicate their lives to eachother.
When I read your absurd attempt at 'highbrow' bigotry, I am reminded of the Nazis and their eugenics. A bit of advice: think carefully about that comparison. They have at least historical example to back them. You, on the otherhand, relating homosexuality to your absurd pseudoscience- what backs that... Aside from your ego?
Davin L.
Here we see the feedback. Not just seven times the length but seven times the intensity.
Let's take a look at how that works:

Each point in the curve of energy will correlate to a new point as the cycle regenerates and expands. So for negative actions, such as my first comments, they will attract negatively biased wave forms - and not just from anyone! Their particular bias was very specific!
Proof? Of course not. Just a coincidence. Now of course this type of evidence can be hand easily hand motioned away. But for anyone who is curious - take a look at your own relationships and see if your own negative biases have attracted similar sizable feedback.
As to homosexuality, again, this same regenerative process occurs constantly. Every thought, every action regenerates. Our bodies regenerate some 1,500,000 cells in less than a minute.
In my view the male/male female/female bit weakens the polar bias of an individual causing confusion, depression, etc. One need only listen to Ms. Heche's claims that she felt she was "insane" while with Ellen Degeneres, to see an example of this polarity weakening mental distress distorted-sex relationships often make manifest.
Polarity is important. In this world our drive, our lust for life is motivated by these polarity attractions. Anything that weakens our polarity makes us listless, purposeless and much like a ship without a captain or a rudder. It's not just a biological thing, it effects the individuals mentally. But this is just my unpopular opinion and observation. It is more in tune with the views of homosexuality held by science for the first 3/4ths of the twentieth century until the drug culture fully kicked in and free love, gender bender and other phrases of the flower power generation took root.
The Nazi bit gets old, doesn't it? Surely you can find some other labels in your quest for demonization?
SDAI-Tech1
