It's great fun to just arbitrarily declare someone either a racist, a homophobe or whatever label one imagines when one doesn't understand what someone is saying.
Look up arbitrary in the dictionary- the reactions you are getting have consistent common cause.
And I don't think you understand a damn bit what you are saying when it comes to science. Despite your pretentions. (Hint- it is these pretentions turned nasty and used as a basis for devaluing people that has you on the hot seat... And rightly so!)
"If I point out that homosexual sex acts fail to result in offspring - I am suddenly a homophobe and pseudoscientist."
Point of fact: that statement is the very essence of dishonesty. If you had gone no further then that, nobody wuld be riding you- but the point is that tyou used claims of certain knowledge to categorize whole sets of people as degenerate.
" I don't know the sexual orientation of the various zone members and so there are likely some folks who will get so blinded with fury at my posts that they will not comprehend or hear what I am saying. Which is really sad all the way around.
"
This is like saying only black people get pissed off at racist comments. Really stupid and pathetic.
"Which just goes to illustrate how ignorance on the left is pervasive. For the left the Hydrogen and Uranium are equal - because they say they are. To view anything in its true context is not permitted because it might shatter some of the illusions and delusions they lives under and with every moment of every day. "
A desperate attempt at a red herring- what does "The Left" have to do with this? This is about the vile behavior of inventing a pseudoscience cosmology and then using that to dehumanize your fellow man (IE: Nazi like behavior). The day "The Left" does this is the day it becomes relevant in this discussion. Save your tired old boogeymen for political discussions.
"Too many folks here on the left post like manic-depressives and swing through the highs and lows like a monkey on the jungle gym."
Remember what I said about Irony? Look into it.
" Even Lee, while being perpetually blasted on the left and forced to wear a "virtual" kkk hood and prepared for the tar and feathers seems to handle it fairly well and doesn't start having a cow until provoked extraordinarily. "
You really are out of touch with reality, aren't you?
"That they happened to be right will not make such name-callers repentant - quite the contrary - their fragile egos will spend time trying to retaliate. (Pretty much the same way this post will probably launch a thousand tirades) ZPE was pseudo. Now the military and government researchers are throwing money at it. Nanotechnology was pseudo. Almost every other week a new break through in nanotechnology comes about. "
SDAI: If you are incapable of seeing the difference between you armchair cosmology and nanotechnology- then I really do pity you.
"Several folks here calls wave forms and vortices pseudo and are completely illiterate of the structure of the world around them"
No, we are just illiterate of your subjective grasp of profundity- Which is fine, as we all are of eachother. The appropriate and effective way to convey your sensations of subjective profundity is through art, music and poetry. Just because it REALLY REALLY REALLY seems true to you has no bering on its objective value. Most people realize this when they are still very young- its a revelation (and a developmental psychology stage) that you should seek to attain. Please consider getting professional help to realize this as it actually is a documented psychological problem that can be helped with treatment should you choose to seek it.
"The atoms in your hand have wave forms and vortices - there's nothing pseudo about them. That's not just my view it's in countless texts and universities throughout the world."
Yes, Tech- but this is no less and no more profound than saying that circles are everywhere in nature. It does not mean you can have a cosmology based on the notion of circles. It does not mean circles have any generative force in the universe. It does not mean that circles explain things.
And what you call "wave forms" are actually the common-language words we associate with a mathematical construct. To try to attribute the every-day meanings associated with those common-language words with the mathematical construct, or to try to insert the meaning of the mathematial construct into the average every day meaning of the common language words is like bringing a glass of wine to the Mona Lisa, or the Mona Lisa to a glass of wine. Incompatible types of things in this universe. Please consider getting professional help to realize this: go to college and study Physics.
"Thousands of quantum physicists all over the world are dealing with things you can't see. The quantum field isn't pseudo at all, it's only folks when confronted with the unknown and incomprehensible get a deflation "
What you have done is filter an objective and mathematical study of ffacets of the universe through your subjective and mathematically ignorant world view to create a cosmology based more off the vaguness of human language than the truth of ath and logic. Thats exactly and only what you have done.
The rest is just garbage I don't have time for. As you say: it has become tiresome.
Davin L.
Current Events » in reply to Mirror mirror in the post...
Againm- Irony escapes you little techie
The whole thread (88 posts)
- More info on Saddam than I knew, by far.
- Don't you suppose
- Well, everyday is a new day for the average bowwow
- 11 HOURS, ONE CONSERVATIVE SAID HE WOULDN'T WATCH IT, another lied, another said without documentation it's all lies. And that's it.
- Since you are simply accepting a lie as big as the lies about ufs, what do you want? (n/t)
- So why don't you support GWB?
- That's not a bad question.
- re: That's not a bad question.
- raising my hand
- re: raising my hand
- re: raising my hand
- re: raising my hand
- re: raising my hand
- re: raising my hand
- re: That's not a bad question.
- G'morning, little fella. Life treatin' you OK? (n/t)
- raising my hand
- re: That's not a bad question.
- That's not a bad question.
- Don't take it too hard. A good number of people here never actually check out my links, either. (n/t)
- Thank-you everyone for keeping me thinking
- It would be great if that were the issue.
- Look, I'm beginning to see the problem...
- You said before that you anticipated taking a break when politics started getting to you.
- taking a break
- re: You said before that you anticipated taking a break when politics started getting to you.
- PS: For an example of delusion, follow the bouncing 8-ball
- re: PS: For an example of delusion, follow the bouncing 8-ball
- Verisimilar statements versus delusion and a bit on victimization.
- Thank you for calling me "deluded"
- PS: For an example of delusion, follow the bouncing 8-ball
- Welcome to a real, frustrating, world.
- Ayn Rand also said . . .
- re: Look, I'm beginning to see the problem...
- The silent majority read your posts and agree with you, Mr Brosz. Please consider doing your own blog. (n/t)
- For what it's worth...
- You said before that you anticipated taking a break when politics started getting to you.
- Look, I'm beginning to see the problem...
- I don't doubt it.
- In one frame they said he supported terrorists, then in another they said he didn't. Very interesting. (n/t)
- Apparently a flash animation...
- The last text in that peice sent a very uncomfortable chill up my spine... (n/t)
