All your points are good ones. I guess I was just skimmlng along the surface with my comments about Nixon and Vietnam.
No doubt that later in the war Nixon would have "pulled less punches", but in the context of the times I'm not sure it would've turned out better, and might have turned out worse. Vietnam was our first big experience with asymmetrical warfare, and so "punches" would likely have been defined as stepping up our traditional approach and hitting harder: More bombing, more massed troops, more attempts to establish strongholds. It was the bombing in particular that caused so much discontent here and abroad, and so doing more of it might have made the political outcome even more painful than it was. In military terms, a little didn't work, and I'm not sure that more would have been any more effective. A qualitative change was called for, more than a quantitative change.
Off Topic » in reply to re: rewriting history
re: rewriting history
The whole thread (96 posts)
- What the hell do conservatives want? An alternate history project
- Points of divergence...
- But, but, but
- A couple of suggestions. No Social Security, and no Pearl Harbor
- The irony of it all
- This is what I think you're proposing.
- ( A hint for 'em.) Tony Blair would be speaking German. (n/t)
- re: What the hell do conservatives want? An alternate history project
- Not gonna happen: Conservatives have no imagination.
- I wish I was that good
- Have faith
- I'm so damned tired....
- Have faith
- There seems to have been a "Publius" back there. (n/t)
- A problem
- I'll go, if someone will lead.
