If a religion has set up that dichotomy, then it's impossible not to think of God as an individual, usually with human attributes and personality.
Mystic traditions in all the major religions, including Christianity, seek to break down the psychological separation between divine and human by integrating everything in one great dance, sort of like a spiritual universal string theory.
If the universe is in fact the divinity, that means there is likely no conscious direction of its existence. Probably. For all we know, with our limited senses and our likewise limited brains.
The divinity still would have awareness, though: us. Because, if the wall is down, we humans become integral parts of the universe, not above the beasts and below the angels. After being raised with a cosmic view of ourselves as favorite children of an all-knowing and benevolent, if distant, Parent, some people find this deeply disturbing.
Personally, I rather like the idea of being a neuron.
Off Topic » in reply to So true
Some religions create a separation between human beings and divinity.
The whole thread (103 posts)
- Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- re: Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- After all the comments in this thread I listened to it...
- re: Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- Literalism has its pitfalls
- re: Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- Heard it too.
- re: Interesting view point, but
- Why do otherwise smart people think that religion solves the first causes problem? (n/t)
- Creation is an oxymoron.
- re: Creation is an oxymoron..... I see you Reorganized some words, did
- 64,000 Monkeys....
- Well...
- I'd like to see your proof of your assertion (n/t)
- circular infinity
- That's just math though
- Causation is driven by chaos
- re: Causation is driven by chaos
- Infinite Parameters (warning long)
- Universal I/O
- The problem must be addressed at the "atomic" level
- Is there really any chaos in the game of life?
- Conway’s Game of Life is the starting point
- disagree: adding more dimensions to Life does not require adding anything random.
- Randomness is required to model this problem
- nice stuff, Gary
- re: Randomness is required to model this problem
- Life is a good model of a creationist view
- Randomness is required to model this problem
- disagree: adding more dimensions to Life does not require adding anything random.
- I should have capitalized the L in Life
- Agent Smith Quotes
- Conway’s Game of Life is the starting point
- Is there really any chaos in the game of life?
- re: Creation is an oxymoron..... I see you Reorganized some words, did
