Don't get me wrong, I have alot of faith in math. It's just that not all equations represent reality accurately. Suppose that the universe isn't an idealized hypersphere. What exactly is a hypersphere that is not idealized? How many imperfections does it have, and do they mean anything for us? And more practically, mathematical models aren't real, they are abstractions, symbols. What IS real? What is it made of? Why does it subscribe to one mathematical description and not another different model?
Alas we are at the end of our abilities and still can't fully understand it all. If the universe is endless then knowing everything is logically impossible. If the universe is limited then knowing would leave us with no hope of surmounting our problems.
2nd Law of Thermodynamics: if an engine operating at 600 degrees K must exhaust heat at 300 degrees K then it can be at most 50 percent efficient. Does this somehow apply to knowledge as well? Are we missing a big piece of the picture because our brains must waste 'something' to function?
I don't know.
Off Topic » in reply to circular infinity
That's just math though
The whole thread (103 posts)
- Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- re: Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- After all the comments in this thread I listened to it...
- re: Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- Literalism has its pitfalls
- re: Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- Heard it too.
- re: Interesting view point, but
- Why do otherwise smart people think that religion solves the first causes problem? (n/t)
- Creation is an oxymoron.
- re: Creation is an oxymoron..... I see you Reorganized some words, did
- 64,000 Monkeys....
- Well...
- I'd like to see your proof of your assertion (n/t)
- circular infinity
- That's just math though
- Causation is driven by chaos
- re: Causation is driven by chaos
- Infinite Parameters (warning long)
- Universal I/O
- The problem must be addressed at the "atomic" level
- Is there really any chaos in the game of life?
- Conway’s Game of Life is the starting point
- disagree: adding more dimensions to Life does not require adding anything random.
- Randomness is required to model this problem
- nice stuff, Gary
- re: Randomness is required to model this problem
- Life is a good model of a creationist view
- Randomness is required to model this problem
- disagree: adding more dimensions to Life does not require adding anything random.
- I should have capitalized the L in Life
- Agent Smith Quotes
- Conway’s Game of Life is the starting point
- Is there really any chaos in the game of life?
- re: Creation is an oxymoron..... I see you Reorganized some words, did
