Sorry RL I do not understand stationary energy that can be described as having the ability to do work.
Thats your problem, not mine... energy is energy- an electron and a positron will annihilate eachother and release energy- their relative velocities have nothing to do with that fact. An object that is at rest in one reference frame has velocity in another reference frame...
I maintain that this rest energy is internal to fundamental particles and is kinetic in nature, that is; it contains motion even though that motion can not be detected externally. I disagree with the notion that "mass is simply another form of energy" I maintain that the essence of mass is a different entity from that of energy.
Fortunately it has been shown beyond a shadow of a doubt that the universe does not give a damn what you maintain...
I maintain that the fundamental essence of mass is conserved in all energy transformations.
Again, it doesnt matter what you believe WITHOUT PROOF! Electrons and positrons have mass- when they annihilate they release energy in the form of photons which are massless... ENERGY is conserved...
(snip inane drivel)
"The philosophy of one century is the common sense of the next. :-)"
Sometimes, but garbage like you are spouting just remains garbage....
Off Topic » in reply to re: Oxymoron??
Why do I bother....?
The whole thread (103 posts)
- Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- re: Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- After all the comments in this thread I listened to it...
- re: Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- Literalism has its pitfalls
- re: Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- Heard it too.
- re: Interesting view point, but
- Why do otherwise smart people think that religion solves the first causes problem? (n/t)
- Creation is an oxymoron.
- re: Creation is an oxymoron..... I see you Reorganized some words, did
- 64,000 Monkeys....
- Well...
- I'd like to see your proof of your assertion (n/t)
- circular infinity
- That's just math though
- Causation is driven by chaos
- re: Causation is driven by chaos
- Infinite Parameters (warning long)
- Universal I/O
- The problem must be addressed at the "atomic" level
- Is there really any chaos in the game of life?
- Conway’s Game of Life is the starting point
- disagree: adding more dimensions to Life does not require adding anything random.
- Randomness is required to model this problem
- nice stuff, Gary
- re: Randomness is required to model this problem
- Life is a good model of a creationist view
- Randomness is required to model this problem
- disagree: adding more dimensions to Life does not require adding anything random.
- I should have capitalized the L in Life
- Agent Smith Quotes
- Conway’s Game of Life is the starting point
- Is there really any chaos in the game of life?
- re: Creation is an oxymoron..... I see you Reorganized some words, did
