when you wrote -
I'm deeply awed by the Laws of Physics and the physical beauty of nature. I also believe that life is sacred and the highest form of life is consciousness. .. (I don't need to drag in some old guy on a golden throne with a glowing triangle floating over his head).
and I responded -
the excerpt as I've selected it, is word-for-word part of the Hebrew approach, especially with thinkers like Maimonedes
I didn't address this properly:
the highest form of life is consciousness
..that's again true from the Hebrew (and apparently Islamic) approach, because God is not a form of life in any sense of word or concept. You might then ask, what's the point of postulating something so incorporeal, but rather than deal with that on logical grounds I rather think it comes down to a gut-level sense of recognition (mentioned before)
Off Topic » in reply to re: Thanks... Starting points for this sort of analysis
.. actually, I should clarify here:
The whole thread (103 posts)
- Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- re: Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- After all the comments in this thread I listened to it...
- re: Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- Literalism has its pitfalls
- re: Julia Sweeney's "Letting Go of God"
- Heard it too.
- re: Interesting view point, but
- Why do otherwise smart people think that religion solves the first causes problem? (n/t)
- Creation is an oxymoron.
- re: Creation is an oxymoron..... I see you Reorganized some words, did
- 64,000 Monkeys....
- Well...
- I'd like to see your proof of your assertion (n/t)
- circular infinity
- That's just math though
- Causation is driven by chaos
- re: Causation is driven by chaos
- Infinite Parameters (warning long)
- Universal I/O
- The problem must be addressed at the "atomic" level
- Is there really any chaos in the game of life?
- Conway’s Game of Life is the starting point
- disagree: adding more dimensions to Life does not require adding anything random.
- Randomness is required to model this problem
- nice stuff, Gary
- re: Randomness is required to model this problem
- Life is a good model of a creationist view
- Randomness is required to model this problem
- disagree: adding more dimensions to Life does not require adding anything random.
- I should have capitalized the L in Life
- Agent Smith Quotes
- Conway’s Game of Life is the starting point
- Is there really any chaos in the game of life?
- re: Creation is an oxymoron..... I see you Reorganized some words, did
