Would you please give the scientific explanation to the following questions.

1) What is the composition/structure of energy?
2) What is creativity and creation?
3) Do you consider thoughts as being tangible?

Sure Johannes,

You'll have to bear with me though as it doesn't just roll off the tongue in a few sentences. ;-)

1. Energy and mass are interchangeable according to Einstein's special relativity. The equation E=MC2 is valid for all observed physical processes. So energy can form mass and vice-versa. In our universe we observe kinetic energy and potential energy. Kinetic as the name implies is in motion, whereas potential energy is relatively static.

Energy is defined as the capacity to do work. Work has a specific definition in scientific terminology and refers to the movement of a particle/particles. Various forces are used in defining this work. Strong & weak nuclear interactions and their potential energy, electromagnetic potential energy and gravitational potential energy.

Max Planck said that the energy level of a quantum is proportional to it's frequency. This means the higher the frequency, the higher the energy. We observe this in all forms of electromagnetic radiation as well. In my own papers I've linked quantum frequency as a major defining element of energy as it exists in any given unknown spectra, even if it is beyond our present measurement equipment or discernment. The massive potential energy of any adjoining high-energy spectra which exists composed of energy with high rates of frequency, and influencing our atomic spectra, make the acceleration of galaxies explicable.

So energy exists as wave forms with various properties and relationships. Static energy as is found in an atom, is not truly static, but is contained in one location, generally as the result of an energy field. The nucleus and the particles have many and varied wave relationships with eachother and such energy is not released without great coaxing.

Kinetic energy is energy in motion. A particle with mass and velocity has a kinetic energy given by the equation:

E=1/2mv2

So to identify the composition/structure of energy we see that it will depend upon where we look and how we measure. It is safe to assume that potential energy will manifest with varying properties and forms as it changes its frequency relationship. In the material, observable universe we presently observe atoms in motion and relatively stationary exhibiting measurable levels of kinetic and potential energy. Various theories put forth other concepts such as dark matter and quantum strings which represent energy in different forms than we can yet observe/verify. All, however, regardless of their diverse shape or configuration are assumed to possess energy of a kinetic or potential nature.

2) You're looking for a scientific answer so I'll give you the best I can here. Creativity is the act of forming new shapes by the modifying/using of existing materials/ideas. Creativity is the new configuration of existing materials. Creation is not the transformation of nothing into something. There always has to be something to work with. All fiction writing has its roots in reality and morphs it. All inventions are providing new concepts spurred by existing needs and applications. All paintings are spurred by inspiration and use existing form, color and thought for their creation. Etcetera, etcetera.

Creation defined as the process of manipulating nothing to something is impossible and, scientifically, we have no evidence that such a process is possible. Meanwhile we have the conservation of energy principle --which completely defies such a process--and it is demonstrated a hundred trillion times squared per nanosecond just in the room around us.

3) Re: Thoughts & tangibility.

Thoughts are quite tangible. Whether measured as electrical activity between brain cells or philosophically as concepts with distinct ideas and meanings, thoughts have form and substance. If thoughts exist generated in the brain with specific wave forms and frequencies then we have one way with which we can measure thought.

I have given much thought to thought. ;-) If we look at Max Planck's assertion about quanta again and the energy level proportional to frequency we can put forth some fun thought speculation. High frequency thought would be more powerful and influence more people than low frequency thought. Our great thinkers whose words are still taught centuries later are evidence of this energy potential.

A wave form that is in a state of imbalance doesn't propagate well. Hate, frenzy, etcetera are rejected quickly by others, giving evidence to the proportional propagation of thought as a coherent energy expression.

Thought compatibility could be conjectured also on the basis of frequency relationship. Folks sharing similar ideas or likes and dislikes congregate and associate with each other. Wheras someone on a different set of 'thought wavelengths' will tend to be rejected by any group without the same frequency and wavelength. With each interaction these thought conflicts create tangible results based upon either their compatibility or their disparity.

Well Johannes, that's all for now--my fingers are already growing tired from all this kinetic energy they are moving to the keys.

;-)

Hope that answered your questions.