Flame » in reply to Follow-up -- does NPR lurk at HZ?

The whole thread (126 posts)

• Polarization - TB - 1/13/2007 9:59:43 PM
  • Follow-up -- does NPR lurk at HZ? - Fox - 1/20/2007 1:57:25 AM
    • LOL (n/t) - Yeti - 1/21/2007 7:30:38 AM
  • A thought on all of this from an observer - Martha - 1/15/2007 12:50:49 PM
    • re: A thought on all of this from an observer - azstrummer - 1/16/2007 12:38:02 AM
      • Thank-you Art....and you can call me anything....except late for dinner (n/t) - Martha - 1/16/2007 4:42:32 AM
        • You're a good sport, Martha - Robert - 1/16/2007 5:19:18 AM
          • I second that - azstrummer - 1/16/2007 3:31:25 PM
            • Separating the men from... oh, wait... - Fox - 1/16/2007 6:50:13 PM
              • In the Republican party you need a crowbar..... (n/t) - azstrummer - 1/16/2007 9:23:58 PM
                • Damn, I thought it was just vaseline...... - Lindy - 1/16/2007 10:23:16 PM
                  • ewwww.....gross (n/t) - azstrummer - 1/16/2007 11:05:09 PM
          • A good sport indeed. - et - 1/16/2007 6:39:18 AM
            • re: A good sport indeed. - Martha - 1/16/2007 3:15:45 PM
            • See what I have to put up with? - Robert - 1/16/2007 7:53:26 AM
  • TB vs 7 leftists...and the winner is... - SDAI-Tech1 - 1/15/2007 12:28:54 PM
    • You, of course SDT. The impartial adjudicator... (n/t) - et - 1/15/2007 8:03:10 PM
      • Indeed - Yeti - 1/15/2007 8:10:16 PM
        • re: Indeed - TB - 1/15/2007 8:42:35 PM
          • Perhaps you're asking the wrong question - Robert - 1/15/2007 9:08:47 PM
            • Idealogies - Lindy - 1/16/2007 5:41:03 PM
  • re: Why ? Because... - Raoul - 1/14/2007 9:06:21 AM
    • Because black-and-white thinking IS polarization. (n/t) - Bowser - 1/15/2007 7:15:05 AM
  • "why there is such polarization?" - Robert - 1/14/2007 2:27:15 AM
    • re: "why there is such polarization?" - Martha - 1/17/2007 7:01:39 PM
      • "The answer is there is no answer.' - Lindy - 1/17/2007 9:35:10 PM
      • Not at all simplistic - Robert - 1/17/2007 8:22:42 PM
        • re: Not at all simplistic - Martha - 1/18/2007 11:30:19 AM
    • re: "why there is such polarization?" - Martha - 1/16/2007 6:41:46 PM
      • On apathy and passion - TB - 1/17/2007 5:41:54 AM
        • vapid - Robert - 1/17/2007 4:33:08 PM
          • re: vapid - TB - 1/17/2007 7:54:12 PM
            • And Vain! - Yeti - 1/19/2007 4:00:02 PM
            • "Either we have to try to change things where this philosophy is being bred....." - Lindy - 1/17/2007 8:59:16 PM
        • re: On apathy and passion - Lindy - 1/17/2007 10:50:28 AM
      • re: "why there is such polarization?" - Robert - 1/16/2007 9:01:39 PM
        • Speak for yourself - azstrummer - 1/16/2007 11:10:05 PM
          • re: Speak for yourself - Martha - 1/16/2007 11:50:21 PM
          • ;-) (n/t) - Robert - 1/16/2007 11:12:30 PM
    • I think I've got the answer. - TB - 1/14/2007 3:02:37 AM
      • Yes? - Robert - 1/14/2007 3:10:37 AM
        • re: Yes? - Martha - 1/16/2007 5:32:21 PM
          • Yes - Robert - 1/16/2007 6:55:52 PM
            • understood (n/t) - Martha - 1/16/2007 7:31:15 PM
        • Okay, I get it. (n/t) - TB - 1/14/2007 3:12:46 AM
          • This is clearly a longterm project - Robert - 1/14/2007 3:35:59 PM
            • re: Clearly, a long term project - Fox - 1/14/2007 6:47:12 PM
              • re: Clearly, a long term project - Robert - 1/15/2007 3:58:29 AM
                • The soft, chewy Center - Fox - 1/15/2007 8:12:14 PM
                  • Nougat Nation - Robert - 1/15/2007 9:03:57 PM
                    • Utopian dreams - Fox - 1/16/2007 2:31:22 AM
                      • Centrist heroes - azstrummer - 1/16/2007 9:04:54 PM
                      • re: Utopian dreams - Robert - 1/16/2007 6:07:29 AM
                        • " We bend so that we never break." - Lindy - 1/16/2007 8:30:57 PM
                          • "At least the last elections didn't appear fixed." - TB - 1/17/2007 5:09:44 AM
                            • re: "At least the last elections didn't appear fixed." - azstrummer - 1/18/2007 4:32:40 PM
                              • Shorter answer. - TB - 1/18/2007 9:40:10 PM
                                • We heard you the first 27 times you said this. - alcaray - 1/18/2007 10:02:27 PM
                                  • Back then we didn't have a perfect lab experiment on the subject. - TB - 1/18/2007 10:46:38 PM
                                    • Was it good for you too? - Lindy - 1/19/2007 1:22:55 AM
                                    • So tell me - azstrummer - 1/18/2007 11:27:20 PM
                                      • re: So tell me - TB - 1/19/2007 12:24:30 AM
                                        • They found nothing - azstrummer - 1/19/2007 5:26:04 AM
                                          • Maybe you don't get how this works. - TB - 1/20/2007 5:06:12 AM
                                    • As I said once before... - alcaray - 1/18/2007 11:09:49 PM
                                      • re: As I said once before... - TB - 1/19/2007 12:11:52 AM
                          • The steamroller - Robert - 1/16/2007 8:51:11 PM
                            • Presidential "debates" LOL - Lindy - 1/16/2007 10:45:21 PM
  • Hogwash - azstrummer - 1/13/2007 11:57:16 PM
    • FANTASTIC post Art.... - Lindy - 1/16/2007 10:59:01 PM
      • Thanks Lindy - azstrummer - 1/16/2007 11:24:46 PM
    • When one has been SO wrong for SO long, the blaming of others has to get intense. - Bowser - 1/14/2007 1:06:46 AM
      • I must admit..... - Lindy (on second glass of wine) - 1/16/2007 11:08:02 PM
        • Now that gives me an idea - Robert - 1/16/2007 11:25:21 PM
          • I'm in - azstrummer - 1/16/2007 11:35:04 PM
        • No, what you really must admit.. - azstrummer - 1/16/2007 11:13:12 PM
          • re: No, what you really must admit.. - Lindy - 1/16/2007 11:39:45 PM
    • "Democrats again call for immediate and unconditional surrender." - TB - 1/14/2007 12:11:54 AM
      • re: "Democrats again call for immediate and unconditional surrender." - azstrummer - 1/14/2007 12:32:42 AM
        • re: "Democrats again call for immediate and unconditional surrender." - Lindy - 1/16/2007 11:32:49 PM
        • More lipstick, same pig - TB - 1/14/2007 1:04:09 AM
          • re: More lipstick, same pig - azstrummer - 1/16/2007 12:44:58 AM
            • Nice goalpost moving. - TB - 1/16/2007 4:14:17 AM
              • Don't need to. You couldn't kick a ball into the Grand Canyon. (n/t) - azstrummer - 1/16/2007 9:22:43 PM
        • That post was from me. In response to "Polarization" from TB. (n/t) - Bowser - 1/14/2007 12:50:17 AM
    • Olbermann be praised brother. Amen. (n/t) - et - 1/14/2007 12:04:43 AM
  • And yet... - Robert - 1/13/2007 11:33:15 PM
    • re: And yet... - TB - 1/14/2007 1:14:50 AM
      • re: Isn't that the problem? - Raoul - 1/14/2007 10:49:00 AM
      • No, it wouldn't be productive. - Robert - 1/14/2007 2:29:04 AM
        • "Providing so many rich examples of polarization isn't addressing the question, it's only reinforcing the need to answer it. " - Lindy - 1/17/2007 12:07:51 AM
        • I'll throw you one clue... - TB - 1/14/2007 3:05:00 AM
          • In other words... - alcaray - 1/15/2007 7:54:43 AM
            • No. - TB - 1/15/2007 8:51:08 PM
              • "I watch good! Red light stop, green light go, yellow light go very fast." - alcaray - 1/15/2007 10:19:49 PM
                • re: "I watch good! Red light stop, green light go, yellow light go very fast." - Lindy - 1/17/2007 1:54:45 AM
                  • Aww shucks. (n/t) - alcaray - 1/17/2007 7:16:56 PM
              • re: No. - Robert - 1/15/2007 9:11:47 PM
                • Interesting. - TB - 1/16/2007 4:16:14 AM
                  • Yes and no - Robert - 1/16/2007 5:12:09 AM
                    • On arriving at answers - TB - 1/16/2007 5:50:45 AM
                      • And just who is Jane Galt? - Robert - 1/16/2007 6:28:41 AM
                        • re: And just who is Jane Galt? - TB - 1/17/2007 3:44:14 AM
                          • In fact - Yeti - 1/17/2007 7:23:47 AM
                            • Actually... - TB - 1/17/2007 8:08:14 AM
                              • You and I had an interchange... - alcaray - 1/18/2007 6:17:09 PM
                              • Try this one on for size. - Yeti - 1/17/2007 4:53:25 PM
                                • I would count that as a definite point for you. - TB - 1/17/2007 8:06:55 PM
                                  • re: I would count that as a definite point for you. - Pissed-as-hell Yeti! - 1/17/2007 9:36:48 PM
                                    • Should we make a list over the past thirty years? - TB - 1/17/2007 10:30:34 PM
                                      • We have opposible thumbs and frontal lobes. - Yeti - 1/17/2007 10:46:08 PM
                                        • "Broad brush?" - TB - 1/17/2007 11:33:36 PM
                              • Spurious specificity - Robert - 1/17/2007 3:57:39 PM
                          • are you insane? Or did you just lose all of your memory? - Yeti - 1/17/2007 7:21:47 AM
                          • Hindsight bias - Robert - 1/17/2007 5:48:39 AM
                          • "Nobody I remember said, "Hey, what if the Sunnis and Shiites start a civil war?" - Lindy - 1/17/2007 4:17:27 AM
                            • Exact quotes, please. Mentioning sectarian war. (n/t) - TB - 1/17/2007 5:47:41 AM
                              • re: Exact quotes, please. Mentioning sectarian war. - Lindy - 1/17/2007 11:02:53 AM
    • re: And yet... - azstrummer - 1/13/2007 11:57:59 PM
      • No, I swear, I don't have that kind of power! - Robert - 1/14/2007 12:16:50 AM
  • Buchanan sidebar - TB - 1/13/2007 10:11:03 PM
    • And here I thought it was a reply to my PB comment. (n/t) - et - 1/14/2007 12:09:17 AM
    • And yet... - Robert - 1/14/2007 12:08:13 AM
      • A question worth its own thread... - TB - 1/14/2007 1:41:58 AM
      • I said I thought he was honest... - et - 1/14/2007 12:13:12 AM
        • The tugboat and the supertanker - Robert - 1/14/2007 12:21:19 AM