"The Democrats know damn well what "redeployment" means in this context. I'm just not letting them get away with it."
Ah, there we are. People calling for no further deployment of troops and a reevaluation of our involvement in Iraq are all Democrats. You might want to check that labeling out with Chuck Hagel (sp?) or James Baker. By the way, there's a wonderful video on YouTube right now of Hagel blowing away Joe Lieberman on a news show debate. I might have to have a closer look at the man and his voting record. May come a time when we have a choice between him and some Democrat like Hillary.
You begin a post about polarization just so you can throw out zingers like that. What a piece of work you've become.
Art
Flame » in reply to More lipstick, same pig
re: More lipstick, same pig
The whole thread (126 posts)
- Polarization
- Follow-up -- does NPR lurk at HZ?
- LOL (n/t)
- A thought on all of this from an observer
- TB vs 7 leftists...and the winner is...
- re: Why ? Because...
- "why there is such polarization?"
- re: "why there is such polarization?"
- re: "why there is such polarization?"
- I think I've got the answer.
- Yes?
- re: Yes?
- Yes
- understood (n/t)
- Yes
- Okay, I get it. (n/t)
- This is clearly a longterm project
- re: Clearly, a long term project
- This is clearly a longterm project
- re: Yes?
- Yes?
- Hogwash
- And yet...
- re: And yet...
- re: Isn't that the problem?
- No, it wouldn't be productive.
- "Providing so many rich examples of polarization isn't addressing the question, it's only reinforcing the need to answer it. "
- I'll throw you one clue...
- In other words...
- No.
- "I watch good! Red light stop, green light go, yellow light go very fast."
- re: No.
- No.
- In other words...
- re: And yet...
- re: And yet...
- Buchanan sidebar
- Follow-up -- does NPR lurk at HZ?
