Very nicely said Robert. (she says with a sigh of relief).
At least the last elections didn't appear fixed.
If they had been, we wouldn't be having this polite discussion looking at our the soft underbelly of democracy.
However, your line above:
>"Sad that the parties grew powerful enough to steamroller them, and dictate the terms of Presidential debates. That the parties saw nonpartisan civics education and open debate as a threat says a lot about the bankruptcy of modern political parties.'
Being a Canadian, I am rather fascinated with the politics here and have endeavored to try and understand the histronics of it. If I am correct, did the above occur because of political "sponsorship" or "lobbying" whereby political parties were not manipulated by their constituents, but by the corporate interests and clever media propaganda that steamrolled an agenda in?
Flame » in reply to re: Utopian dreams
" We bend so that we never break."
The whole thread (126 posts)
- Polarization
- Follow-up -- does NPR lurk at HZ?
- LOL (n/t)
- A thought on all of this from an observer
- TB vs 7 leftists...and the winner is...
- re: Why ? Because...
- "why there is such polarization?"
- re: "why there is such polarization?"
- re: "why there is such polarization?"
- I think I've got the answer.
- Yes?
- re: Yes?
- Yes
- understood (n/t)
- Yes
- Okay, I get it. (n/t)
- This is clearly a longterm project
- re: Clearly, a long term project
- This is clearly a longterm project
- re: Yes?
- Yes?
- Hogwash
- And yet...
- re: And yet...
- re: Isn't that the problem?
- No, it wouldn't be productive.
- "Providing so many rich examples of polarization isn't addressing the question, it's only reinforcing the need to answer it. "
- I'll throw you one clue...
- In other words...
- No.
- "I watch good! Red light stop, green light go, yellow light go very fast."
- re: No.
- No.
- In other words...
- re: And yet...
- re: And yet...
- Buchanan sidebar
- Follow-up -- does NPR lurk at HZ?
