Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to re: So tell me

They found nothing
azstrummer — (archived)

Should I type it in all caps? ELECTRONIC MACHINES LEAVE NO CONCRETE EVIDENCE of fraud unless they produce a paper receipt.

Boy, that's the second time in a day you slipped in the "WTC blown up by George Bush" crowd to include mainstream Democrat pundits. What a crock. The reports that I heard about improprieties in the Ohio voting (which by the way was much more than electronic machine problems) came for the most part from people that stayed far away from the absurd 9/11 theories. If you bring that idiocy up again, you're in for the fight of your life. Have the energy for that one?

Oh, and you cleverly avoided the direct question as always. It's why I ask them anymore. It's this clear indication you're about to distort and reframe. It's like you hang a bell around your neck.

Did you also not read that I said that your party couldn't distort the vote totals too much because of the huge amount of election watchers this time? What part of math don't you understand where the size of the actual margin can eliminate the cheating advantage and still allow the opposition to win, and Tom, sometimes they may only win by a tiny amount. The final total means nothing in the proof of fraud.

No Tom, the problem is you choose to ignore a huge volume of circumstantial evidence pointing to Republican vote fraud. There becomes a time in a criminal trial where a person can be convicted completely on circumstantial evidence and that threshold was crossed long ago. The type of fraud alleged in Ohio was widespread, directed at one party almost entirely, and was designed so no definitive proof could ever be accumulated. The problem is Tom, the complaints came in in droves long before the election results were ever tabulated. This was no case of post-election whining as you contend. It was real and should horrify any American. You just didn't care because your guy won. Some principles.

Art

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (126 posts)