Re: Agnostics
I stand by my original definition. Agnostics believe that since they don't have enough knowledge to decide that there is or is not a God, then they can't decide on the matter. However, in most simple logical arguments, lack of positive evidence is usually taken to mean that the proposition is not true. For example, I cannot "prove" that the crust of Mars in not honeycombed underground with vast cities that have no surface signs, but since there is nothing whatsoever to prove they are there, a reasoning person assumes they are not there.