Flame

Spit on the floor and call the cat a bastard... When the temperature of a thread on one of the other discussion rooms becomes too high, a moderator may move it here so that it doesn’t interfere with more civil discussion. There are very few rules here- No racism, bigotry, threats or doxing. In the past we have found some of the most humorous and entertaining discussions have been on the Flame board. So step into the ring, or grab a bag of popcorn and enjoy the spectacle.

Business Insider - "15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America" - bowser - 4/13/2012 8:10:35 AM
- Re: Business Insider - "15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America" - Jody - 4/14/2012 12:55:49 AM
- What JimH said. (A commenter to the article Bowser linked to) - ER - 4/13/2012 4:09:22 PM
  - Comments are closed now. Too bad. - TB - 4/13/2012 4:50:30 PM
    - Re: Comments are closed now. Too bad. - ER - 4/13/2012 5:21:43 PM
      - What, refute the numbers, methodology, sources, or premises? - TB - 4/13/2012 6:13:37 PM
        
        Re: What, refute the numbers, methodology, sources, or premises? - ER - 4/13/2012 6:25:41 PM
        
        Re: What, refute the numbers, methodology, sources, or premises? - TB - 4/13/2012 6:27:09 PM
        
        Re: What, refute the numbers, methodology, sources, or premises? - bowser - 4/13/2012 6:50:22 PM
        
        Re: What, refute the numbers, methodology, sources, or premises? - ER - 4/13/2012 6:37:26 PM
        
        Re: What, refute the numbers, methodology, sources, or premises? - bowser - 4/13/2012 8:20:25 PM
        
        Re: What, refute the numbers, methodology, sources, or premises? - Jody - 4/13/2012 10:26:56 PM
        
        You don't need to be religious, and you don't need to be black to love gospel music. - ER - 4/13/2012 8:35:43 PM
        
        Re: You don't need to be religious, and you don't need to be black to love gospel music. - bowser - 4/13/2012 8:44:15 PM
        
        After the past few days, you need yet another demonstration? There's nobody home. - TB - 4/13/2012 6:44:00 PM
        
        Re: After the past few days, you need yet another demonstration? There's nobody home. - ER - 4/13/2012 6:48:40 PM
- Re: Business Insider - "15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America" - ER - 4/13/2012 12:47:06 PM

Our tax dollars at work - TB - 4/13/2012 10:38:28 PM

The Scottish verdict - ER - 4/12/2012 11:50:43 AM
- Re: The Scottish verdict - VelociraptorBlade - 4/13/2012 4:38:28 AM

Pick the group - TB - 4/12/2012 5:28:47 PM
- Re: Pick the group - ER - 4/12/2012 11:13:42 PM
  - Re: Pick the group - ER - 4/12/2012 11:18:54 PM
    - Re: Pick the group - ER - 4/12/2012 11:35:21 PM
      - Don't work too hard on it. I nailed my point quite a while ago. - TB - 4/13/2012 2:54:47 AM
        
        Hey, I got no problems with ducks - ER - 4/13/2012 3:00:21 AM
- A little hint: - TB - 4/12/2012 10:39:42 PM
- That reminds me... - VelociraptorBlade - 4/12/2012 9:26:09 PM
  - I wouldn't mind seeing it. - TB - 4/12/2012 10:48:37 PM
    - Re: I wouldn't mind seeing it. - VelociraptorBlade - 4/13/2012 4:32:34 AM

And I thought it was 57 - ER - 4/12/2012 12:33:04 PM
- Re: And I thought it was 57 - bowser - 4/12/2012 8:41:25 PM
  - Re: And I thought it was 57 - ER - 4/12/2012 9:21:34 PM
- Actually, it's more like 76. - TB - 4/12/2012 2:47:37 PM
  - No, Tom, you've got it wrong. - ER - 4/12/2012 3:30:51 PM
    - Re: No, Tom, you've got it wrong. - ER - 4/12/2012 4:03:55 PM
      - Re: No, Tom, you've got it wrong. - ER - 4/12/2012 4:18:04 PM
        
        I don't know. Is your name proudly displayed on the DSA membership lists? - TB - 4/12/2012 4:42:32 PM
        
        Re: I don't know. Is your name proudly displayed on the DSA membership lists? - ER - 4/12/2012 6:06:05 PM
        
        Re: I don't know. Is your name proudly displayed on the DSA membership lists? - TB - 4/12/2012 6:26:17 PM
        
        Re: I don't know. Is your name proudly displayed on the DSA membership lists? - ER - 4/12/2012 7:11:14 PM

The Flame Board! - TB - 4/12/2012 3:04:54 PM
- Re: The Flame Board! - Jody - 4/12/2012 6:06:41 PM
- Re: The Flame Board! - bowser - 4/12/2012 5:44:05 PM

On engineering, government, and complex fixes - TB - 4/11/2012 7:10:22 PM
- Re: On engineering, government, and complex fixes - BuckGalaxy - 4/12/2012 5:15:50 AM
  - Start here: - TB - 4/12/2012 3:20:15 PM
- Re: On engineering, government, and complex fixes - VelociraptorBlade - 4/12/2012 2:39:33 AM
  - Re: On engineering, government, and complex fixes - ER - 4/12/2012 3:07:20 AM
    - Subtlety can sometimes be a liability here. - TB - 4/12/2012 3:13:04 AM
      - Re: Subtlety can sometimes be a liability here. - ER - 4/12/2012 3:19:35 AM
        
        Re: Subtlety can sometimes be a liability here. - VelociraptorBlade - 4/12/2012 4:27:50 AM
        
        Like this? - podrock - 4/12/2012 12:42:48 PM
        
        The easiest way I found is to go to the YouTube page for a video. - TB - 4/12/2012 2:53:19 PM
        
        One caveat: - TB - 4/12/2012 3:23:58 PM
        
        Re: Subtlety can sometimes be a liability here. - TB - 4/12/2012 3:45:20 AM
        
        Re: Subtlety can sometimes be a liability here. - ER - 4/12/2012 4:21:22 AM
        
        Re: Subtlety can sometimes be a liability here. - TB - 4/12/2012 4:42:51 AM
        
        Squeeeeeek... - TB - 4/12/2012 4:43:44 AM
- Simple answer: Treat law like software. - Robert - 4/11/2012 9:26:31 PM
- Re: On engineering, government, and complex fixes - ER - 4/11/2012 8:41:23 PM
  - Predictable? - TB - 4/11/2012 9:55:16 PM
    - One example of the problem here. - TB - 4/11/2012 9:59:17 PM
      - Re: One example of the problem here. - ER - 4/11/2012 10:47:12 PM
        
        When you finally understand there is self-interest on both sides of this issue, the discussion can proceed. - TB - 4/11/2012 10:58:24 PM
        
        Re: When you finally understand there is self-interest on both sides of this issue, the discussion can proceed. - ER - 4/12/2012 12:52:41 AM
        
        Re: When you finally understand there is self-interest on both sides of this issue, the discussion can proceed. - TB - 4/12/2012 1:03:08 AM
        
        Re: When you finally understand there is self-interest on both sides of this issue, the discussion can proceed. - ER - 4/12/2012 2:36:30 AM
        
        What I hoped you'd notice is that, historically, governments match that description far more than businesses do. - TB - 4/12/2012 3:06:24 AM
        
        Re: What I hoped you'd notice is that, historically, governments match that description far more than businesses do. - ER - 4/12/2012 3:15:43 AM
        
        We weren't discussing socialized medicine. - TB - 4/12/2012 3:43:47 AM
        
        Re: We weren't discussing socialized medicine. - ER - 4/12/2012 4:34:13 AM
        
        We weren't discussing socialized medicine. (n/t) - TB - 4/12/2012 4:40:28 AM

Democratic leaders in 2006 - TB - 4/12/2012 4:16:21 AM
- Re: Democratic leaders in 2006 - BuckGalaxy - 4/12/2012 5:03:34 AM
- Re: Democratic leaders in 2006 - VelociraptorBlade - 4/12/2012 4:19:30 AM

Anybody else stocking up on popcorn... - TB - 4/12/2012 3:58:24 AM

So what can a poor boy do? - ER - 4/9/2012 10:54:58 AM
- If this place is any indication... - RobVG - 4/10/2012 1:13:13 AM
  - Re: If this place is any indication... - ER - 4/10/2012 2:30:34 AM
- Re: So what can a poor boy do? - RobVG - 4/10/2012 12:13:32 AM
- Re: So what can a poor boy do? - bowser - 4/9/2012 5:10:43 PM
  - Re: So what can a poor boy do? - ER - 4/9/2012 6:15:18 PM
    - Re: So what can a poor boy do? - bowser - 4/10/2012 4:04:00 PM
      - You're a wise man, Bowser. - ER - 4/10/2012 5:26:49 PM
        
        Re: You're a wise man, Bowser. - bowser - 4/11/2012 2:17:51 AM

More about corporate libertarianism. - ER - 4/9/2012 11:23:58 AM
- All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides? - TB - 4/9/2012 4:13:04 PM
  - Re: All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides? - bowser - 4/9/2012 4:31:29 PM
    - Re: All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides? - ER - 4/9/2012 4:40:28 PM
      - Re: All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides? - bowser - 4/9/2012 4:52:39 PM
    - Re: All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides? - TB - 4/9/2012 4:37:16 PM
      - Re: All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides? - bowser - 4/9/2012 4:41:18 PM
        
        Re: All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides? - TB - 4/9/2012 4:43:36 PM
        
        Re: All of these bong fantasies, including Carson's "Mutualism," fail in execution on one simple point: Who decides? - bowser - 4/9/2012 4:56:23 PM
        
        In the context of the ideology we're discussing, please. - TB - 4/9/2012 5:00:49 PM
  - I must have scored a hit. I see secondary explosions. - ER - 4/9/2012 4:29:52 PM
    - Re: I must have scored a hit. I see secondary explosions. - bowser - 4/9/2012 4:39:52 PM
      - You realize you cough up the same two or three examples every time to "prove" that the free market can't work? - TB - 4/9/2012 5:08:39 PM
        
        Re: You realize you cough up the same two or three examples every time to "prove" that the free market can't work? - bowser - 4/9/2012 5:32:16 PM
    - Friend, your shots didn't even hit the same ocean I'm in. - TB - 4/9/2012 4:35:44 PM
      - Re: Friend, your shots didn't even hit the same ocean I'm in. - ER - 4/9/2012 4:45:28 PM
        
        In the context of the references we were discussing please. - TB - 4/9/2012 5:19:48 PM
        
        You want references? - ER - 4/9/2012 5:52:57 PM

Corporate Libertarianism and the betrayal of Adam Smith - ER - 4/8/2012 3:25:52 PM
- "planned and managed by the world’s largest corporations to maximize financial returns to top managers" - RobVG - 4/8/2012 7:18:17 PM
  - Re: "planned and managed by the world’s largest corporations to maximize financial returns to top managers" - bowser - 4/8/2012 9:16:46 PM
  - Re: "planned and managed by the world’s largest corporations to maximize financial returns to top managers" - ER - 4/8/2012 8:06:20 PM
- I constantly link to people who encapsulate my opinions better than I sometimes can. - TB - 4/8/2012 5:24:34 PM
  - Another chapter from the same book, I see. - ER - 4/8/2012 5:37:33 PM
    - You agree with the bulleted points? Tell me you're just pulling my chain. - TB - 4/8/2012 9:04:59 PM
      - Re: You agree with the bulleted points? Tell me you're just pulling my chain. - ER - 4/8/2012 9:49:04 PM
        
        Okay, you are pulling my chain. - TB - 4/8/2012 10:05:23 PM
        
        Re: Okay, you are pulling my chain. - ER - 4/8/2012 10:25:14 PM
        
        Yep. A whole lot of gobbledygook. - TB - 4/8/2012 10:54:22 PM
        
        Silicon-based macroprocessors - Robert - 4/9/2012 12:32:48 AM
        
        By the way, what the hell is a "corporate libertarian?" - TB - 4/9/2012 3:29:12 AM
        
        "By the way, what the hell is a corporate libertarian?" - ER - 4/9/2012 9:41:44 AM
        
        Get back to me when you've compiled a version of your software on one of those devices. - TB - 4/9/2012 3:20:52 AM
        
        You're really out of your depth. - Robert - 4/9/2012 5:17:22 PM
        
        Re: You're really out of your depth. - TB - 4/9/2012 5:30:15 PM
        
        How about an SiO2 slide rule? Right out of the corporate libertarian box. - ER - 4/9/2012 1:28:10 AM
      - Re: You agree with the bulleted points? Tell me you're just pulling my chain. - bowser - 4/8/2012 9:20:33 PM

Just sayin' - Jody - 4/6/2012 1:40:42 AM
- Re: Just sayin' - bowser - 4/6/2012 9:34:01 PM
  - Re: Just sayin' - Jody - 4/6/2012 10:12:44 PM
- Re: Just sayin' - BuckGalaxy - 4/6/2012 5:29:00 AM
  - "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - TB - 4/6/2012 4:17:22 PM
    - Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - bowser - 4/8/2012 9:51:08 AM
      - Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - Jody - 4/8/2012 4:18:35 PM
        
        Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - bowser - 4/8/2012 5:20:24 PM
        
        Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - Jody - 4/8/2012 5:37:39 PM
        
        Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - bowser - 4/8/2012 7:21:00 PM
        
        Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - Jody - 4/8/2012 10:54:13 PM
        
        State and Federal governments, right now, spend something like $450 billion a year on medical care for those who can't afford it. - TB - 4/8/2012 8:37:19 PM
        
        Re: State and Federal governments, right now, spend something like $450 billion a year on medical care for those who can't afford it. - bowser - 4/8/2012 9:03:30 PM
        
        What's the point of telling you anything at all? - TB - 4/8/2012 9:24:33 PM
        
        Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - RobVG - 4/8/2012 7:55:29 PM
        
        Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - bowser - 4/8/2012 9:04:50 PM
        
        "The Kid" - RobVG - 4/9/2012 3:38:32 PM
        
        Re: "The Kid" - Jody - 4/9/2012 3:47:02 PM
        
        "Nothing…absolutely nothing is working how we would like it to." - TB - 4/9/2012 4:30:19 PM
        
        Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - Jody - 4/8/2012 9:47:22 PM
        
        Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - Jody - 4/8/2012 8:11:23 PM
        
        Like I said in a different post, it's a lot easier to wear a colored ribbon and yell for someone else to pay more taxes than to actually do something. - TB - 4/8/2012 8:59:21 PM
    - Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - BuckGalaxy - 4/6/2012 7:12:45 PM
      - Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - ER - 4/7/2012 6:23:29 PM
      - When we had the tax rates of the 90s, spending was a trillion dollars less a year, in 2005 dollars. - TB - 4/6/2012 7:58:10 PM
    - Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - bowser - 4/6/2012 6:50:49 PM
    - Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - Jody - 4/6/2012 5:55:08 PM
      - Re: "Moral vacuum?" What do you think, Jody? - FrankC - 4/6/2012 7:02:09 PM
        
        Yeah, but see, under the liberal "moral code" it's not his decision. - TB - 4/6/2012 7:59:22 PM
        
        Re: Yeah, but see, under the liberal "moral code" it's not his decision. - Jody - 4/6/2012 8:34:54 PM
        
        Re: Yeah, but see, under the liberal "moral code" it's not his decision. - Jody - 4/6/2012 8:11:26 PM
- Re: Just sayin' - bowser - 4/6/2012 2:28:02 AM
  - None of the things Jody wrote made the slightest dent, did it? - TB - 4/6/2012 4:27:55 AM
    - Re: None of the things Jody wrote made the slightest dent, did it? - bowser - 4/6/2012 6:21:41 AM
      - Valuing community. - RobVG - 4/7/2012 5:30:32 PM
        
        Re: Valuing community. - bowser - 4/8/2012 9:49:56 AM
        
        Re: Valuing community. - Jody - 4/7/2012 7:21:40 PM

An interesting discovery with interesting implications... - Vitruvius - 4/9/2012 3:03:53 AM
- It's the Law of Unforeseen Consequences. - ER - 4/9/2012 9:33:35 AM

"Romney turns to Obama after GOP primary sweep." - bowser - 4/4/2012 6:50:45 AM
- The Democrats in 2008 nominated someone who was the personification of an ideology that has wrecked everything it's touched. - TB - 4/4/2012 4:04:03 PM
  - Re: The Democrats in 2008 nominated someone who was the personification of an ideology that has wrecked everything it's touched. - bowser - 4/4/2012 7:11:02 PM
    - Re: The Democrats in 2008 nominated someone who was the personification of an ideology that has wrecked everything it's touched. - ER - 4/9/2012 12:19:34 AM

Visual aid on the "Buffett Rule" - TB - 4/7/2012 12:13:24 AM
- Re: Visual aid on the "Buffett Rule" - VelociraptorBlade - 4/8/2012 12:39:16 AM
- Shouldn't there be a similar graph for Selective Service? - ER - 4/7/2012 5:24:54 PM
  - Re: Shouldn't there be a similar graph for Selective Service? - TB - 4/7/2012 6:46:03 PM
    - Re: Shouldn't there be a similar graph for Selective Service? - ER - 4/7/2012 7:14:16 PM
      - That's because the analogy stunk. - TB - 4/8/2012 12:11:27 AM
        
        Re: That's because the analogy stunk. - ER - 4/8/2012 1:16:53 AM
- Re: Visual aid on the "Buffett Rule" - VelociraptorBlade - 4/7/2012 1:14:14 AM
  - So, what's the next step? - TB - 4/7/2012 1:34:11 AM
    - Re: So, what's the next step? - bowser - 4/7/2012 4:07:31 AM
      - Re: So, what's the next step? - Jody - 4/7/2012 3:45:23 PM
      - No, I haven't "won." - TB - 4/7/2012 3:11:10 PM
        
        Re: No, I haven't "won." - bowser - 4/7/2012 6:27:56 PM
        
        Okay, let's do bailouts. - TB - 4/7/2012 7:02:18 PM
        
        Re: No, I haven't "won." - ER - 4/7/2012 7:01:04 PM
        
        Re: No, I haven't "won." - bowser - 4/8/2012 6:21:21 AM
        
        But never forget... - ER - 4/8/2012 8:21:55 PM
        
        Re: No, I haven't "won." - TB - 4/7/2012 7:04:26 PM
        
        "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more." -Alvin Lee. - ER - 4/7/2012 7:21:19 PM
        
        "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more." - TB - 4/8/2012 12:17:39 AM
        
        Re: "Tax the rich, feed the poor, til there are no rich no more." - ER - 4/8/2012 12:44:19 AM
        
        Who's making out in this economy? - TB - 4/8/2012 4:15:27 AM
        
        Re: Who's making out in this economy? - bowser - 4/8/2012 6:50:12 AM

What will be the future outcome... - FrankC - 4/8/2012 5:31:32 AM
- I don't think there is much we can do. - ER - 4/8/2012 2:06:22 PM
- Re: What will be the future outcome... - VelociraptorBlade - 4/8/2012 7:20:29 AM
- Re: What will be the future outcome... - bowser - 4/8/2012 6:03:41 AM

Three questions: - Jody - 4/7/2012 8:23:16 PM
- Spend some time on this site. - TB - 4/8/2012 12:24:22 AM
  - Re: Spend some time on this site. - VelociraptorBlade - 4/8/2012 12:47:40 AM
    - It's the Congressional Budget Office. A pretty good source. - TB - 4/8/2012 1:47:29 AM
    - Re: Spend some time on this site. - Jody - 4/8/2012 12:58:43 AM

From the "we're all doomed" file - RobVG - 4/5/2012 2:59:16 AM
- Unless, of course, we adopt the recommended "stabilized world" scenario referenced in Turner's paper. - TB - 4/5/2012 4:32:25 PM
- Re: From the "we're all doomed" file - bowser - 4/5/2012 9:24:50 AM
- Re: From the "we're all doomed" file - VelociraptorBlade - 4/5/2012 7:23:56 AM

GOP bans sticks and poles in Tampa Convention area, but not guns! LOL - BuckGalaxy - 4/4/2012 12:44:51 AM
- Re: GOP bans sticks and poles in Tampa Convention area, but not guns! LOL - VelociraptorBlade - 4/4/2012 9:18:08 PM
- Re: GOP bans sticks and poles in Tampa Convention area, but not guns! LOL - bowser - 4/4/2012 1:16:58 AM
  - Re: GOP bans sticks and poles in Tampa Convention area, but not guns! LOL - BuckGalaxy - 4/4/2012 3:05:01 AM
    - Read the article. - TB - 4/4/2012 3:16:09 AM
      - Re: Read the article. - BuckGalaxy - 4/4/2012 4:50:42 PM
        
        Re: Read the article. - TB - 4/4/2012 5:30:22 PM

Banging the war drums - TB - 4/4/2012 5:36:55 PM
- Re: Banging the war drums - bowser - 4/4/2012 7:02:25 PM

"Will no one rid me of this turbulent branch of government?" (continued) - TB - 4/3/2012 4:48:15 PM
- Re: "Will no one rid me of this turbulent branch of government?" (continued) - bowser - 4/3/2012 9:55:11 PM
  - Re: "Will no one rid me of this turbulent branch of government?" (continued) - TB - 4/3/2012 10:43:32 PM
    - Re: "Will no one rid me of this turbulent branch of government?" (continued) - bowser - 4/4/2012 1:08:06 AM
      - In other words, no case was ever brought before the Supreme Court. - TB - 4/4/2012 3:13:21 AM
        
        Re: In other words, no case was ever brought before the Supreme Court. - bowser - 4/4/2012 4:22:27 AM
        
        You're really a lot more comfortable back in 2006 than you are in the present day, aren't you? - TB - 4/4/2012 4:51:49 AM
        
        Re: You're really a lot more comfortable back in 2006 than you are in the present day, aren't you? - bowser - 4/4/2012 6:45:50 AM
- Re: "Will no one rid me of this turbulent branch of government?" (continued) - VelociraptorBlade - 4/3/2012 6:57:37 PM
  - It's kind of interesting how "not socialist" is now "radical." - TB - 4/3/2012 7:12:17 PM
    - Re: It's kind of interesting how "not socialist" is now "radical." - bowser - 4/3/2012 9:54:00 PM
- Incidentally... - TB - 4/3/2012 6:07:41 PM

Who said this? - FrankC - 4/3/2012 12:09:09 AM
- The quote in context: - TB - 4/3/2012 9:43:13 PM
- Re: Who said this? - VelociraptorBlade - 4/3/2012 6:59:15 PM
  - Re: Who said this? - FrankC - 4/3/2012 7:43:42 PM
    - Re: Who said this? - Jody - 4/3/2012 8:34:39 PM
      - Re: Who said this? - FrankC - 4/3/2012 10:03:20 PM
- Re: Who said this? - Jody - 4/3/2012 2:09:09 PM
  - Re: Who said this? - FrankC - 4/3/2012 7:45:39 PM
- Re: Who said this? - TB - 4/3/2012 12:51:42 AM
  - Very good, von Mises - FrankC - 4/3/2012 1:12:48 AM

Study tracks how conservatives lost their faith in science. - bowser - 3/29/2012 9:28:05 PM
- Re: Study tracks how conservatives lost their faith in science. - BuckGalaxy - 3/30/2012 2:02:22 PM
  - I've seen enough. - RobVG - 3/30/2012 3:16:16 PM
    - Re: I've seen enough. - BuckGalaxy - 3/31/2012 1:33:23 AM
      - This isn't new Buck - RobVG - 4/1/2012 6:22:43 PM
      - I know exactly who Chris Mooney is. - TB - 3/31/2012 3:53:46 AM
        
        Re: I know exactly who Chris Mooney is. - BuckGalaxy - 3/31/2012 7:05:06 AM
        
        This is just people trying hard to push the idea of some biological determinism as the foundation of political ideas. - TB - 3/31/2012 3:46:13 PM
        
        Re: This is just people trying hard to push the idea of some biological determinism as the foundation of political ideas. - BuckGalaxy - 4/1/2012 1:20:09 AM
        
        I got about a third of the way through. - TB - 4/1/2012 3:12:07 AM
    - Maybe empirical observation is more useful than studies. :) (n/t) - TB - 3/30/2012 5:51:40 PM
- Food for thought - RobVG - 3/30/2012 1:13:46 AM
  - Re: Food for thought - TB - 3/30/2012 2:02:52 AM
    - Re: Food for thought - bowser - 3/30/2012 3:03:01 AM
      - Re: Food for thought - TB - 3/30/2012 3:47:24 AM
        
        Re: Food for thought - bowser - 3/30/2012 3:48:34 PM
        
        Yes, that is the dictionary definition. - TB - 3/30/2012 5:07:11 PM
        
        Re: Yes, that is the dictionary definition. - bowser - 3/30/2012 5:44:58 PM
      - Re: Food for thought - RobVG - 3/30/2012 3:24:59 AM
        
        Re: Food for thought - bowser - 3/30/2012 3:36:41 AM
- This study is severely flawed. - ER - 3/29/2012 11:55:20 PM
  - I have but one question - FrankC - 4/1/2012 12:10:24 AM
- When "science" started being used as a political weapon. - TB - 3/29/2012 11:32:51 PM
  - Re: When "science" started being used as a political weapon. - ER - 3/29/2012 11:57:43 PM

Occupy Movement hanging out, slowly drying. - TB - 4/1/2012 3:00:50 PM
- Re: Occupy Movement hanging out, slowly drying. - bowser - 4/1/2012 3:39:06 PM
  - Last October Democratic leaders were embracing the movement and using it to make political points. - TB - 4/1/2012 4:30:55 PM
    - Re: Last October Democratic leaders were embracing the movement and using it to make political points. - bowser - 4/1/2012 5:27:00 PM

« newer topics · page 44 of 157 · older topics »

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

Flame