I see, so Buster has cause to call me a liar and ignorant on less grounds than I accuse the revisionists of lying?
I didn't take what Buster said as calling you a liar but maybe that's just a lack of sensitivity on my part.
I see, so truth and falsehood is determined by an election? Relativism at its finest?
No, truth and falsehood is determined by evidence strong enough to convict. Anything less is just opinion.
All of which will be irrelevant to the truth of the matter, which I guess you don't really care about- just as long as your boy gets elected, eh?
Ask me when Bush is convicted of being a liar. Bush is not "my boy", I will not be wailing about moving to Canada if a Democrat is elected. I trust the electorate to make the right decision. If Bush fails to be elected it will be the best case yet made that he was wrong about a number of things. The opposite is also true.
Current Events » in reply to re: Falls short of lying
re: Falls short of lying
The whole thread (69 posts)
- John Hawkins flattens the "Bush Lied" meme
- re: John Hawkins flattens the "Bush Lied" meme
- TRAITOR!!!!
- The Spanish American War was our first preemptive war
- re: the "Bush Lied" meme
- C'mon Tom, quit defending Bush.....
- re: the "Bush Lied" meme
- you don't know if the lying was deliberate or not
- "Obviously enormous amounts of information said by the Bush administration weren't true"
- Gee Phil......
- re: "Obviously enormous amounts of information said by the Bush administration weren't true"
- "Six months." Speaking of fraudulent statements
- Traces?
- re: Traces?
- And this is real bullshit, here.
- re: Traces?
- you must be the last person in the world who believes in those trailers (n/t)
- "Obviously enormous amounts of information said by the Bush administration weren't true"
- re: John Hawkins flattens the "Bush Lied" meme
