Current Events — HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to No, not what I'm, saying. But an unfired nonfunctional piece of junk that only looks remotely like an AK47 does not substantiate the claim that he just killed someone with that weapon!

Show me
Tom Brosz — (archived)

- Show me how they could be used as part of WMD manufacturing
- Identify the process they are suited for, mechanically
- Exhibit some physical evidence that they have been used for WMD manufacturing (traces we both know could be found)

The first two are dealt with in this report, which shows how these trailers could have been part of a WMD plant. The third item is quite simple: it it is possible they had not been used yet.

The report answers a lot of questions that skeptics have brought up. I just wish I had the State or other reports. Both would be necessary for an honest analysis.

While this doesn't nail it down tight, it does show that the evidence for WMD function is more than just guesswork.

It is also important to note that the WMD use implies the existence of at least one missing trailer components. This doesn't make things any easier.

The trailer has obvious equipment, with plumbing, tanks, and other items. It is connected up in a certain way. Frankly, I am stumped at to why it's so damn hard for either the WMD proponents or the H2 proponents to nail down the function of this system. Did they bring in any process engineers at all? A schematic of the proposed WMD process, compared to a schematic of the trailer, wouldn't suck.

And why are you so hot to disregard Brit Intel?

This is the same Brit Intel who still insists Saddam was trying to get uranium from Africa (which, last time I looked, has more nations than just Niger.) I guess we are all being picky.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (69 posts)