This is not worth my time
Given that you are unable to effectively and decisively demonstrate the threat Saddam posed to the US , even AFTER the invasion, doesn't that suggest something about the necessity of war?
Give me a break. This is like arguing UFO cover-ups.
Tom wrote:"it seems that the only evidence of "clear and present danger" from terrorism that would probably be acceptable to them is a crater somewhere in America."
I have given you conditions for what I would consider clear and present danger, and they did not include a dramatic, theatrical, emotionally appealing 'crater somewhere in america'. You know this, we have discussed it three times- do you understand at all why your tac here makes me pissed?
This isn't real discourse, this is theater.
Davin L.