re: Marconi
Tom:
As I mentioned, I didn't keep my research on this, I could probably re-do it, but now that it is 'old news' I'd have to wade througth thousands of links.
As in my response to Buster above, I usually go right to the original source- the more official and less second-hand the better. Is it possible my ref to Marconi was actually second hand? Yes- would I be Surprised if it was? Yes, you and I both know thats not my style. But I gravely doubt it was through the Observer- I usually bracket what they say out unless I can find a better source behind them.
My point in this sub-thread was that you made a rather laughable claim that you were the only person who looked into this matter. Thats what I'm attacking here.
Davin L.