Before there is a trial there must be an indictment, which in this case would be a public hew and cry that could not be denied. So far we do not have such. If that time comes, I would of course support a trial and live with the verdict. The same could have been said of Johnson and the Tonkin incident.
I might believe that Patsy Ramsey killed her daughter, yet she remains unindicted. There are probably more people that think she is guilty of murder than think Bush is a liar. All opinions are meaningless without the impetus to indict. I am not one to believe that just because things don't play out to my personal opinion, something is rotten in Denmark.
As to accountability, it comes in November, 2004.
There are many things that Bush has done that I do not agree with. The steel tariffs, stem cell research, and a stalled space program are just a few. It just so happens that, to me, the most important issue today is the War On Terror and our security. On this issue, he has my complete support, at this point in time.
Current Events » in reply to re: Falls short of lying
Would you support a trial?
The whole thread (69 posts)
- John Hawkins flattens the "Bush Lied" meme
- re: John Hawkins flattens the "Bush Lied" meme
- TRAITOR!!!!
- The Spanish American War was our first preemptive war
- re: the "Bush Lied" meme
- C'mon Tom, quit defending Bush.....
- re: the "Bush Lied" meme
- you don't know if the lying was deliberate or not
- "Obviously enormous amounts of information said by the Bush administration weren't true"
- Gee Phil......
- re: "Obviously enormous amounts of information said by the Bush administration weren't true"
- "Six months." Speaking of fraudulent statements
- Traces?
- re: Traces?
- And this is real bullshit, here.
- re: Traces?
- you must be the last person in the world who believes in those trailers (n/t)
- "Obviously enormous amounts of information said by the Bush administration weren't true"
- re: John Hawkins flattens the "Bush Lied" meme