From Article I:

On August 17, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton swore to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth before a Federal grand jury of the United States. Contrary to that oath, William Jefferson Clinton willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony to the grand jury concerning one or more of the following:

(1) the nature and details of his relationship with a subordinate Government employee;

(WHAT WERE THE ALLEGED PRIOR PERJURIOUS, FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS HE MADE ABOUT THE NATURE OFTHE DETAILS OF HIS RELATIONSHIP? DO YOU EVEN KNOW? I DO. DO YOU THINK IT MIGHT BE IMPORTANT TO SPECIFY WHAT EXACTLY HE SAID THAT WAS PERJURIOUS, FALSE AND MISLEADING IN A LEGAL DOCUMENT OF THIS, OR ANY, MAGNITUDE? )

(2) prior perjurious, false and misleading testimony he gave in a Federal civil rights action brought against him;

(WHAT WERE THE ALLEGED PRIOR PERJURIOUS, FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS HE MADE DURING THE TESTIMONY? DO YOU EVEN KNOW? I DO. )

(3) prior false and misleading statements he allowed his attorney to make to a Federal judge in that civil rights action; and

(WHAT WERE THE ALLEGED PRIOR FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS HE MADE DURING THE TESTIMONY? DO YOU EVEN KNOW? I DO.)

(4) his corrupt efforts to influence the testimony of witnesses and to impede the discovery of evidence in that civil rights action.

(WHAT WERE THE ALLEGED CORRUPT EFFORTS? DO YOU EVEN KNOW? I DO.)

Then Article III (related to the Paula Jones case):

In his conduct while President of the United States, William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed and impeded the administration of justice, and has to that end engaged personally, and through his subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or scheme designed to delay, impede, cover up and conceal the existence of evidence and testimony related to a Federal civil rights action brought against him in a duly instituted judicial proceeding.

The means used to implement this course of conduct or scheme included one or more of the following acts:

(1) On or about December 17, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to execute a sworn affidavit in that proceeding that he knew to be perjurious, false and misleading.

(WHAT WAS THE ALLEGED PERJURIOUS ACT? WHO WAS THE WITNESS HE ALLEGEDLY ENCOURAGED? DO YOU EVEN KNOW? I DO.)

(2) On or about December 17, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to give perjurious, false and misleading testimony if and when called to testify personally in that proceeding.

(WHAT WAS THE ALLEGED PERJURIOUS ACT? WHO WAS THE WITNESS HE ALLEGEDLY ENCOURAGED? DO YOU EVEN KNOW? I DO.)

(3) On or about December 28, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly engaged in, encouraged or supported a scheme to conceal evidence that had been subpoenaed in a Federal civil rights action brought against him.

(WHAT WAS THE ALLEGED SCHEME TO CONCEAL EVIDENCE? DO YOU EVEN KNOW? I DO.)

(4) Beginning on or about December 7, 1997, and continuing through and including January 14, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton intensified and succeeded in an effort to secure job assistance to a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him in order to corruptly prevent the truthful testimony of that witness in that proceeding at a time when the truthful testimony of that witness would have been harmful to him.

(WHO WAS THE ALLEGED WITNESS? WHAT IS THE PROOF OF THIS OR ANY OF THE CHARGES RELATED TO THIS PARTICULAR WITNESS? DO YOU EVEN KNOW? I DO.)

(5) On January 17, 1998, at his deposition in a Federal civil rights action brought against him, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly allowed his attorney to make false and misleading statements to a Federal judge characterizing an affidavit, in order to prevent questioning deemed relevant by the judge. Such false and misleading statements were subsequently acknowledged by his attorney in a communication to that judge.

(WHATWERE THE ALLEGED STATEMENTS? DO YOU EVEN KNOW? I DO.)

(6) On or about January 18 and January 20-21, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton related a false and misleading account of events relevant to a Federal civil rights action brought against him to a potential witness in that proceeding, in order to corruptly influence the testimony of that witness.

(WHAT WAS THE FALSE AND MISLEADING ACCOUNT? WHO WAS THE WITNESS HE ALLEGEDLY ENCOURAGED? DO YOU EVEN KNOW? I DO.)

(7) On or about January 21, 23 and 26, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton made false and misleading statements to potential witnesses in a Federal grand jury proceeding in order to corruptly influence the testimony of those witnesses. The false and misleading statements made by William Jefferson Clinton were repeated by the witnesses to the grand jury, causing the grand jury to receive false and misleading information.

(WHAT WERE THE FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS? WHO WAS THE WITNESS HE ALLEGEDLY CORRUPTLY INFLUENCED? DO YOU EVEN KNOW? I DO.)

First of all, Article 3 I believe was not passed. Regardless, it had no details on the charges.

Because the entire articles of impeachment had almost no details of the alleged "crimes" Clinton committed they are legally flawed. General statements about crimes committed must be accompanied by specific details. Names. Dates. Who. When. What. Where. NEVER in any legal proceedings would the specific details of any legal action be absent as they clearly are here. This document would be laughed out of any court in America. STEP OUT OF YOUR PARTISAN BOX FOR A MINUTE AND THINK ABOUT IT.

I could replace William Jefferson Clinton with Tom B. in every one of these "charges" and there would be no details on what you actually did and said.

Ask ANY lawyer if this is a vaild legal document.

BTW if you are curious WHAT the specifics are I could tell you. But you have to ask, since you obviously don't know.