Dan wrote: "Today is pocked with questions. Yesterday was a sure bet, supported by national leaders and media reps the world over. "
Maybe Fox news and America, Dan, but the contradicting data, at least on terrorist ties, was out there. I know. I presented a LOT of that data to you and others here. Its data that has turned out, so far, to be correct. All you had to do was to approach that data at any time and examine it and weigh it against what Bush and domestic media outlets were reporting. It was documented and convincing. But you didn't, you stuck with what you believed, and you belived what you were told.
Dan wrote: "Try some real reading for a change (not that selective reading you so enjoy [at least you don't have it as bad as Zhavric]) -- and then try real hard to figure it out.
"
And if you want to try to hang me on the hook of 'alternative media' and 'conspiracy theories' and 'selectevie media research' with the Terrorist stuff, then you will fail, and are telling a bald face lie in any case. My sources include State department whitepaper, National Review, Christian Science Monitor, New Republic, BBC and etc. I have demonstrated familiarity with the arguments and writings of pro-war and rightist-leaning authors as well as leftists and my data sources are vetted against eachother and against my own historical research into the socio-political landscape of the area.
I have your number Dan, you just want to call it 'alternamedia' and 'selective' because you don't like what it says.
It was there, it was out there under your nose, it was spoon fed to you, it argued a contrary case that was stronger then the terrorist claims of the Admin... And so far, its born out as being correct. Reason beats the stuffing out of belief yet again.
Davin L.
PS: NyeahNyeah, plus evidence, plus research, plus reason etc beats your NyeahNyeh and your blind faith.
Say hello to the yeti for me.
Flame » in reply to re: Keeping track . . .
A non Kzinti-mode reply
The whole thread (183 posts)
- Immoral
- re: The immorality of napalm usage depends upon what you would consider a moral war . . .
- Nope. You just find excuses
- This thread is certainly easier to follow in 1024 x 768 display mode (n/t)
- The epitome of flame wars! Robert please add this to the hall o' flame!(nt) (n/t)
- You've only scratched the surface, bud
- fwiw, welcome Zhavric...and to Raoul...
- re: You've only scratched the surface, bud
- Actually...
- re: Actually...
- Since its flame, and you are acting
- Wow...
- re: Wow...
- Listen
- Dear Stupid
- re: What . . . ?
- Abandon all integrity oh ye who enter the hollow passage of the Right Wing Mind
- Let me clear it up for you...
- re: Listen
- Listen
- Chamberlain and Hitler were also chummy...
- re: Wow...
- re: Actually...
- Actually...
- My two cents worth on this
- re: Stupid
- re: Immoral
- Immoral
- Napalm is nasty stuff..
- As long as hairs are being split
- Splitting hairs way too finely
- OK, name a great way to die, and one that doesn't take up medical resources (n/t)
- Surely you jest
- yeagh, napalm is bad, but wait till you see what a chemical weapon can do!!
- re: the Burn Unit
- Ok then, name an explosive that won't burn anyone (n/t)
- re: No. YOU tell me what justifies the use of a weapon whose specific intent is to burn people.
- re: the Burn Unit
- Ok then, name an explosive that won't burn anyone (n/t)
- Let's review the situation
- re: the Burn Unit
- re: Surely you jest
- Phycological effects
- yeagh, napalm is bad, but wait till you see what a chemical weapon can do!!
- Well...
- Surely you jest
- Oh come on Robert
- "terror is as terror does"
- Shotguns were widely used by American troops in Vietnam...
- By your definition, we should get rid of everything but pea shooters.
- Shoehorned??
- re: "terror is as terror does"
- "terror is as terror does"
- OK, name a great way to die, and one that doesn't take up medical resources (n/t)
- I love the smell of napalm in the morning.
- re: Remember?
- It smells like children on fire.
- re: Funny girl . . .
- The same could be said about any weapon.
- Lee proves himself to be a P.O.S. yet again
- Oh man!
- I had a uncle killed in Vietnam by a 10 year old.
- re: I had a uncle killed in Vietnam by a 10 year old.
- The only good gook is a dead gook?
- re: The only good gook is a dead gook?
- re: The only good gook is a dead gook?
- re: The only good gook is a dead gook?
- an odd question, given the person.
- I'm sure the children of Hamburg and Berlin had the same look on their faces too.
- I had a uncle killed in Vietnam by a 10 year old.
