Fight a war in which the enemy can hope for no mercy, and you are fighting a war to the death, because the enemy has absolutely no reason not to expect a massacre upon surrender. (See your first example.)
Allow yourself the use of any weapon, no matter how atrocious, and you up the chances of surprise attack (to pre-empt your use of the weapons), guerilla warfare (since your target is indiscriminant, the force you fight will be also), use of similar atrocious weapons against you (as ye sow, so shall ye reap), and generational hatred of you, your army, your nation and your people (behave without humanity, expect to be thought of as less than human). Make no mistake, they will smile to your face. See also, the Balkans. See also, the Irish Question.
Take no quarter and you can expect none. Escalate the fire power of your weapons, and you can expect escalation on the other side. Fight to crush the enemy without mercy, and expect suicide soldiers. See also, kamikaze. See also, Palestinian terror tactics.
The example of the guy who waved through a man who said his wife was in the hospital was not a case of obeying the laws of warfare. He disobeyed his own security procedures. He ought to be digging latrines. One can have security procedures and still prosecute a war in an honorable fashion.
Flame » in reply to Wrong or Stupid, take your pick
Wrong and stupid: no contest
The whole thread (183 posts)
- Immoral
- re: The immorality of napalm usage depends upon what you would consider a moral war . . .
- Nope. You just find excuses
- This thread is certainly easier to follow in 1024 x 768 display mode (n/t)
- The epitome of flame wars! Robert please add this to the hall o' flame!(nt) (n/t)
- You've only scratched the surface, bud
- fwiw, welcome Zhavric...and to Raoul...
- re: You've only scratched the surface, bud
- Actually...
- re: Actually...
- Since its flame, and you are acting
- Wow...
- re: Wow...
- Listen
- Dear Stupid
- re: What . . . ?
- Abandon all integrity oh ye who enter the hollow passage of the Right Wing Mind
- Let me clear it up for you...
- re: Listen
- Listen
- Chamberlain and Hitler were also chummy...
- re: Wow...
- re: Actually...
- Actually...
- My two cents worth on this
- re: Stupid
- re: Immoral
- Immoral
- Napalm is nasty stuff..
- As long as hairs are being split
- Splitting hairs way too finely
- OK, name a great way to die, and one that doesn't take up medical resources (n/t)
- Surely you jest
- yeagh, napalm is bad, but wait till you see what a chemical weapon can do!!
- re: the Burn Unit
- Ok then, name an explosive that won't burn anyone (n/t)
- re: No. YOU tell me what justifies the use of a weapon whose specific intent is to burn people.
- re: the Burn Unit
- Ok then, name an explosive that won't burn anyone (n/t)
- Let's review the situation
- re: the Burn Unit
- re: Surely you jest
- Phycological effects
- yeagh, napalm is bad, but wait till you see what a chemical weapon can do!!
- Well...
- Surely you jest
- Oh come on Robert
- "terror is as terror does"
- Shotguns were widely used by American troops in Vietnam...
- By your definition, we should get rid of everything but pea shooters.
- Shoehorned??
- re: "terror is as terror does"
- "terror is as terror does"
- OK, name a great way to die, and one that doesn't take up medical resources (n/t)
- I love the smell of napalm in the morning.
- re: Remember?
- It smells like children on fire.
- re: Funny girl . . .
- The same could be said about any weapon.
- Lee proves himself to be a P.O.S. yet again
- Oh man!
- I had a uncle killed in Vietnam by a 10 year old.
- re: I had a uncle killed in Vietnam by a 10 year old.
- The only good gook is a dead gook?
- re: The only good gook is a dead gook?
- re: The only good gook is a dead gook?
- re: The only good gook is a dead gook?
- an odd question, given the person.
- I'm sure the children of Hamburg and Berlin had the same look on their faces too.
- I had a uncle killed in Vietnam by a 10 year old.
