Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to Buh-by

re: Buh-by
gbaikie — (archived)

"Here's me: No, that's not the case. Here's why and here's my evidence to back it up."

What Evidence? Let's go through your last post point by point looking for any evidence.

"I know that Saddam signed that treaty. I also know that there was a specific manner in which we were supposed to go about dealing with possible violations of that treaty. I know this is going to be hard for you, but try... just try to think. Think back to when this all started. What was going on?"

No evidence here.

"Bush Senior had put checks and balances in place to stop another armed conflict between the U.S. and Iraq. Bush Junior IGNORED everything his father put in place, or walked right over it. Bush used the American people's insecurity about terrorists to justify going after the oil supplies under Iraq."

None here

"Now, I know you have no problem with your government slaughtering Iraqi civilians. Clearly, you hate god and have no compassion for your fellow man. What I don't get is why you think that Bush going after Saddam helps you. Yes, you. Specifically."

None here

"Bush is going to give a tax cut. What he should do is raise taxes and then use the money to fix certain aspects of this country... which would result in lower taxes. But, I woulnd't expect a spineles "weekend warrior" armchair quarterback like yourself to have the balls to ask a politician to raise your taxes."

None here

"Next, Bush hasn't done ANYTHING to make America safe from terrorists. He's passed the Patriot Acts I and II which violate the civil rights that you're too ignorant to realize that you have or rather HAD. He's created a mutual foe for Pan-Arabia and Pan-Islam. Think back (I know... twice) to when we uncovered that tape of Osama Bin Laden preaching support for the Iraqi people... that the people of Iraq should band together and strike back against America."

None here

"I have new for you, idiot: that was the single most frightening thing that has happened in this whole conflict."

Nope

"Osama and Saddam are BITTER enemies. They absolutely despise one another and their corresponding peoples. For Osama to get on Iraqi TV and tell the Iraqi people to be strong against us and for them to LISTEN is the single most idiotic thing the Bush administration is responsible for."

Not here

"When your father, someone who is not a C student and a former director of the CIA and the current CIA director tell you, "Don't mess with Iraq" and you do it anyway... well, that's pretty fucking dumb."

None here

Now, on to the post before that [let's whole post shorten up this boring process]:
Come to think of it why waste the bandwith- there is no evidence provided in that post. And one before that:
In this post there was "something" you might stretch definition of evidence to include:
"Saddam was Bush's buddy... or more to the point he was Donald Rumsfeld's buddy. Don't tell me you haven't seen the old news clips from the 80's where Rumsfeld puts his arms around Saddam and gives him a big hug. He was our guy way back when... when Iran was looking like our nemesis we gave him (Saddam) support while secretly supporting Iran."

Donald Rumsfeld working as a govt employee in the US State Dept did meet with Saddam, so this could vaguely be called "evidence".

And finally in your first post, you provided a link that seem to indicated that you supported some socialist, who is also unable to provide any evidence- other than the obvious "evidence" that he is capable of demagoguery- though it's a pretty lame show.

In summary I think I have provided evidence that you are full of shit.
[Yawning]

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (183 posts)