I have not specifically named names and called people out true. But I have most certainly in detail over and over explained the behavior which I believe may exist in the habitablezone which qualifies as helping to incite terrorism in something other than the dupe mode. It is knowingly spreading lies that match terrorist propaganda. I've never called anyone out on the issue because I don't know for sure that's what they are doing. They could all be dupes like I'm sure Lindy is.
I believe the knowing spreading of terrorist lies applies to about 1 to 6 people in the zone because based on other posts I believe they are too intelligent to really believe the bunk they are spouting. If my certainty was higher I would call them out and have no problem believing Gary's was. Remember I didn't start this topic, I'm simply defending someone else's right to do so as a reasonable opinion. My approach with my current level of certainty (50 to 70% depending on individual) was to challenge the lies and point out that those lies help incite terrorism. I have pretty much given up on that though as everyone seems 100% dug in on one side or the other and I don't have a good way to ferrit out the dupes from the liars.
Do I think Gary should have risen to the challenge and named names? I would have if I'd made his comment, but then I have a far different personality type than Gary even if we hold very similar views on most issues. On the other hand I avoided CE prior to 911 because I knew my vociferous independent political views would piss off almost everyone on one topic or another and result in a lot of battles like this which I thought would detract from discussions on space and leave me with very few "friends" here. Unfortunately dealing with terrorism has displaced space as my number one concern. Still socially aware enough though not to accuse someone specifically of treason without damn near certainty.
Regards,
Mark
Flame » in reply to I say again: Put up, or shut up.
Sort of A good Point
The whole thread (148 posts)
- JFC can't we just get along....
- Apparently not (n/t)
- The thread is now locked
- Thank you.
- Uh Frank This Is Flame
- Uh Mark
- Wow The Liberals Took A Poll And Voted Against The Conservative Position
- Point by point
- MA Wins Again
- re: MA Wins Again
- There You Go Again
- Criticism of Bush's war policy = treason
- Aye, there's the rub
- Hello
- I say again: Put up, or shut up.
- Sort of A good Point
- That being the case
- On the WMD Issue
- In The Interest Of Time - Blood For Oil (n/t)
- re: That being the case
- That being the case
- Sort of A good Point
- I say again: Put up, or shut up.
- Well said (n/t)
- Hello
- re: Criticism of Bush's war policy = treason
- Aye, there's the rub
- re: There You Go Again
- Criticism of Bush's war policy = treason
- There You Go Again
- re: MA Wins Again
- MA Wins Again
- "3) Providing aid and comfort to the enemy has nothing to do with treason and no reasonable person would think otherwise."
- Do you speak for all conservatives?
- Hell No
- around and around and around and around
- re: "Wow The Liberals Took A Poll And Voted Against The Conservative Position "
- OK It Is The Conservative Position
- OK It Is _A_ Conservative Position
- The Summary You Ignored
- Restriction of Speech
- Yes You've Got It Wrong
- As, apparently do you
- Why Do You People Ignore Half Of What I've Posted To Make Your Points?
- Wow
- Battle Fatigue?
- Scarred, battered, but unbowed
- Robert did not make a mistake, you did in misunderstanding him.
- We Both Did According To This
- That would be the apology and pledge I referred to. I could not have made my post much simpler. (n/t)
- We Both Did According To This
- Battle Fatigue?
- You people?
- Wow
- Why Do You People Ignore Half Of What I've Posted To Make Your Points?
- As, apparently do you
- Yes You've Got It Wrong
- And Ignored Again (n/t)
- Restriction of Speech
- I see The Plea For Consistency Once Again Falls On Deaf Ears
- re: OK It Is _A_ Conservative Position
- The Summary You Ignored
- OK It Is _A_ Conservative Position
- OK It Is The Conservative Position
- Hell No
- Delete Post Or Modify Name
- Point by point
- Wow The Liberals Took A Poll And Voted Against The Conservative Position
- This Is Flame
- Picking at scabs
- Uh Mark
- It isn't serious, is it FrankC -
- Is this one about me? (n/t)
