Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to That being the case

On the WMD Issue
Mark Eby — (archived)

I realize there are many people here who can't grasp that if the Clinton Administration believed as both Bill and Hillary have clearly stated since then that they believed Iraq had wmd that it was reasonable for Bush to believe the same thing. The arguement that "but he didn't attack Iraq" arguement is BS, he didn't attack Afghanistan for harboring Osama either. Bush and Clinton had differences of philosophies of how to deal with foreign threats, that has very little relevance to how strongly they believed in Iraqi wmd. This is especially true given that the Clinton's have publicly supported Bush's prewar belief in wmd and not come near that Bush lie darguement themselves.

However, I think there are people who know the whole Bush lied arguement is bogus who use it anyway, typically this is tied into the number one propaganda item listed below that this was all about stealing Iraqi oil. But again since I can't tell with high confidence the ignorant, from the politically blinded, from the liars, I'd use a different tack in addressing the issue.

And no I'm not going to do a history search Fox. I know you know these types of comments have been made. If you can't admit these types of comments have been made my belief in your integrity will plummet.

Regards,
Mark

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (148 posts)