Well we've cleared the air on the moderator issue and I'd be satisfied with any attempt to deal with it in a simple obvious way not just my suggestion. I have no problem with you or anyone else confronting calls of treason on a personal level, but I will argue again in the future if anyone tries to narrow definitions just to suit their side. I'll pass on the long list of definitions I was going to try and post to drive this point home since there is at least a slight willingness to consider the idea now and everyone seems weary of the topic.
I know MA doesn't hold grudges, but I doubt very much she is as fond of me as I am of her and I mean that in a platonic sense for the neanderthals out there.
I would contact Gary if I hadn't lost his E-mail address with a change in internet services and/or computer changes. I'd suggest contacting him yourself if you have received any recent E-mails from him. I know Gary has had some issues with loon's in the habitablezone, but I prefer a more open than closed board as you do. I hope that is not his main issue. If it is moderator unfairness I think you are the best one to address that issue through personal correspondance. I don't know Gary's frame of mind on this issue I'm just guessing based on similar views on a lot of issues and past discussions.
Regards,
Mark
Flame » in reply to Scarred, battered, but unbowed
re: Scarred, battered, but unbowed
The whole thread (148 posts)
- JFC can't we just get along....
- Apparently not (n/t)
- The thread is now locked
- Thank you.
- Uh Frank This Is Flame
- Uh Mark
- Wow The Liberals Took A Poll And Voted Against The Conservative Position
- Point by point
- MA Wins Again
- re: MA Wins Again
- There You Go Again
- Criticism of Bush's war policy = treason
- Aye, there's the rub
- Hello
- I say again: Put up, or shut up.
- Sort of A good Point
- That being the case
- On the WMD Issue
- In The Interest Of Time - Blood For Oil (n/t)
- re: That being the case
- That being the case
- Sort of A good Point
- I say again: Put up, or shut up.
- Well said (n/t)
- Hello
- re: Criticism of Bush's war policy = treason
- Aye, there's the rub
- re: There You Go Again
- Criticism of Bush's war policy = treason
- There You Go Again
- re: MA Wins Again
- MA Wins Again
- "3) Providing aid and comfort to the enemy has nothing to do with treason and no reasonable person would think otherwise."
- Do you speak for all conservatives?
- Hell No
- around and around and around and around
- re: "Wow The Liberals Took A Poll And Voted Against The Conservative Position "
- OK It Is The Conservative Position
- OK It Is _A_ Conservative Position
- The Summary You Ignored
- Restriction of Speech
- Yes You've Got It Wrong
- As, apparently do you
- Why Do You People Ignore Half Of What I've Posted To Make Your Points?
- Wow
- Battle Fatigue?
- Scarred, battered, but unbowed
- Robert did not make a mistake, you did in misunderstanding him.
- We Both Did According To This
- That would be the apology and pledge I referred to. I could not have made my post much simpler. (n/t)
- We Both Did According To This
- Battle Fatigue?
- You people?
- Wow
- Why Do You People Ignore Half Of What I've Posted To Make Your Points?
- As, apparently do you
- Yes You've Got It Wrong
- And Ignored Again (n/t)
- Restriction of Speech
- I see The Plea For Consistency Once Again Falls On Deaf Ears
- re: OK It Is _A_ Conservative Position
- The Summary You Ignored
- OK It Is _A_ Conservative Position
- OK It Is The Conservative Position
- Hell No
- Delete Post Or Modify Name
- Point by point
- Wow The Liberals Took A Poll And Voted Against The Conservative Position
- This Is Flame
- Picking at scabs
- Uh Mark
- It isn't serious, is it FrankC -
- Is this one about me? (n/t)