Hence my previous comments. The problem is you are playing a different game than MA, Fox, Robert, and Me. We have a real fundamental disagreement over issues and are trying to get the other side to see our point even if we get a little testy. You on the other hand are playing a childish game of "I'm smarter than you are nanananana" and playing it poorly.
You may have started on the same field and been diverted by my moore comment. If so and you truely despise Moore, I apologize. I really did think it applied to you even if it was intended as a flame. It was intended as the kind of flame where a person knows he's been flamed in the eyes of the opposing team, but can't counter because it's true. Guess I flubbed that one big time although I am truely puzzled by the "liberal" reaction and intend to start a seperate thread on that issue. Maybe I missed it or forgot it but I don't recall any of the war opposition slamming Moore's film and it certainly did have vocal supporters. It is quite cetain however that there are better ways of dealing with an honest mistake in order to reach mutual understanding other than the one you chose. That is exactly why I think you are playing a different game.
Regards,
Mark
Flame » in reply to Mark, I tried, we all tried talking with you.
Oh I Know You Tried
The whole thread (148 posts)
- JFC can't we just get along....
- Apparently not (n/t)
- The thread is now locked
- Thank you.
- Uh Frank This Is Flame
- Uh Mark
- Wow The Liberals Took A Poll And Voted Against The Conservative Position
- Point by point
- MA Wins Again
- re: MA Wins Again
- There You Go Again
- Criticism of Bush's war policy = treason
- Aye, there's the rub
- Hello
- I say again: Put up, or shut up.
- Sort of A good Point
- That being the case
- On the WMD Issue
- In The Interest Of Time - Blood For Oil (n/t)
- re: That being the case
- That being the case
- Sort of A good Point
- I say again: Put up, or shut up.
- Well said (n/t)
- Hello
- re: Criticism of Bush's war policy = treason
- Aye, there's the rub
- re: There You Go Again
- Criticism of Bush's war policy = treason
- There You Go Again
- re: MA Wins Again
- MA Wins Again
- "3) Providing aid and comfort to the enemy has nothing to do with treason and no reasonable person would think otherwise."
- Do you speak for all conservatives?
- Hell No
- around and around and around and around
- re: "Wow The Liberals Took A Poll And Voted Against The Conservative Position "
- OK It Is The Conservative Position
- OK It Is _A_ Conservative Position
- The Summary You Ignored
- Restriction of Speech
- Yes You've Got It Wrong
- As, apparently do you
- Why Do You People Ignore Half Of What I've Posted To Make Your Points?
- Wow
- Battle Fatigue?
- Scarred, battered, but unbowed
- Robert did not make a mistake, you did in misunderstanding him.
- We Both Did According To This
- That would be the apology and pledge I referred to. I could not have made my post much simpler. (n/t)
- We Both Did According To This
- Battle Fatigue?
- You people?
- Wow
- Why Do You People Ignore Half Of What I've Posted To Make Your Points?
- As, apparently do you
- Yes You've Got It Wrong
- And Ignored Again (n/t)
- Restriction of Speech
- I see The Plea For Consistency Once Again Falls On Deaf Ears
- re: OK It Is _A_ Conservative Position
- The Summary You Ignored
- OK It Is _A_ Conservative Position
- OK It Is The Conservative Position
- Hell No
- Delete Post Or Modify Name
- Point by point
- Wow The Liberals Took A Poll And Voted Against The Conservative Position
- This Is Flame
- Picking at scabs
- Uh Mark
- It isn't serious, is it FrankC -
- Is this one about me? (n/t)
