So what part of non-partisan don't you understand you fathead. I'm so fucking tired of this becoming a Republican/Democrat thing with you. It's morons like you that create this stupid divide between us because you buy anything the party elite tell you. I used Eisenhower as an example because he was probably the last Republican president we had that understood the necessity of us not going it alone in the world and you, in your infinite wisdom, somehow think you can use this is for your political one-upmanship. Well, it's not going to fly anymore child. Eisenhower would be appalled with the state of affairs in our country today or are you forgetting his going away speech in which he railed against the growing threat of our military-industrial complex?
Your ignorance shows more and more each day Tom and here's a little news for you pal. I'll bet very few people anymore even click the links you post or if they do, they take a cursory look at the source and determine it's just old Tom hand-picking again from a neocon talking point list.
It never fails anymore, if I respond to one of your group's posts, that you show up the first in line to defend them. What's the matter Tom? Think they can't handle the heat themselves? Are you the designated bottom-feeder hired by the neocons to spit out the talking points before real debate can take place?
I used to believe it'd be fun to get together with all the members of this group and have a beer. You better hope that never happens now. You'd find yourself wearing it. Dickhead.
Flame » in reply to re: Why leave?
So labeling again Tom?
The whole thread (132 posts)
- End to the Occupation
- Yo ER, you weenie!
- Time to re-label
- re: End to the Occupation
- It appears you have al Qaeda confused with the Taliban...... (n/t)
- Can I get fries with that?
- Nuclear safeguards
- re: Supersize?
- re: Absurd
- "We had to do it"
- You need to reread the president’s speeches prior to the war
- That would be 'speech', singular
- No speeches
- Allow me...
- Sure.
- Like I could stop you
- I wish I had your abilities to keep track of and find things.
- At best, liberation was a secondary, if not even tertiary reason
- You ought to review Powell's case before the UN (n/t)
- That would be 'speech', singular
- You need to reread the president’s speeches prior to the war
- (Sorry, meant for Tech1) (n/t)
- Why leave?
- Occupying countries where we are hated, creates terrorists. Or is that the goal? (n/t)
- John Howard on "creating terrorists"
- Could you reprint the BinLaden quotes where he talks about our occupation of his holy land? (n/t)
- While what Howard said was true, it was irrelevant to what alcaray said. (n/t)
- John Howard on "creating terrorists"
- re: Why leave?
- Why go in the first place?
- Occupying countries where we are hated, creates terrorists. Or is that the goal? (n/t)
- re: End to the Occupation
- I would agree
