And political in an era where politics doesn't just mean your senator getting more highway projects because your party is in power, but may mean survival of American citizens.
We get two choices: Democrats or Republicans. I wish I could vote for Washington, Truman, Eisenhower, Reagan, or Lincoln. I can't. I get to vote for whoever the parties barf up every two to four years, and frankly, other than in local races, my vote hasn't really counted since I moved out here to California.
You think Bush was my ideal candidate in 2000? Who else did we get to choose from? McCain, who never met a principle he wouldn't sell out? Alan Keyes, a real theocrat? Steve Forbes would make a great Secretary of the Treasury. Not much of a president.
It does matter.
Missile Defense came up on another thread. One party thinks it should be developed. The other wants the program killed dead and buried in concrete.
One party thinks we should stay in Iraq until the job is done. The other would have us out in a year. If Kerry had won the presidency, we'd be out already, and Zarqawi would be running the Anbar province, or even a chunk of Baghdad.
This continues in other areas.
And that's just foreign policy. I could go over domestic stuff, too, but that isn't life-or-death. Just prosperity over poverty.
Of course it's political. We don't have a choice about it.
I'm glad you think I'm stupid, conditioned by "rings of the bell," while you are one of the "open minded, progressive thinkers." If there's one thing I've found a lot of liberals have in common, it's an amazingly inflated idea of their own brainpower, and contempt for anyone else's.
Flame » in reply to So labeling again Tom?
Of course it's political.
The whole thread (132 posts)
- End to the Occupation
- Yo ER, you weenie!
- Time to re-label
- re: End to the Occupation
- It appears you have al Qaeda confused with the Taliban...... (n/t)
- Can I get fries with that?
- Nuclear safeguards
- re: Supersize?
- re: Absurd
- "We had to do it"
- You need to reread the president’s speeches prior to the war
- That would be 'speech', singular
- No speeches
- Allow me...
- Sure.
- Like I could stop you
- I wish I had your abilities to keep track of and find things.
- At best, liberation was a secondary, if not even tertiary reason
- You ought to review Powell's case before the UN (n/t)
- That would be 'speech', singular
- You need to reread the president’s speeches prior to the war
- (Sorry, meant for Tech1) (n/t)
- Why leave?
- Occupying countries where we are hated, creates terrorists. Or is that the goal? (n/t)
- John Howard on "creating terrorists"
- Could you reprint the BinLaden quotes where he talks about our occupation of his holy land? (n/t)
- While what Howard said was true, it was irrelevant to what alcaray said. (n/t)
- John Howard on "creating terrorists"
- re: Why leave?
- Why go in the first place?
- Occupying countries where we are hated, creates terrorists. Or is that the goal? (n/t)
- re: End to the Occupation
- I would agree
