Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to If you are going to accuse someone of a capital crime, be ready to prove it.

re: If you are going to accuse someone of a capital crime, be ready to prove it.
Mark Eby — (archived)

Uh read like the three or four other subsequent posts on the issue. And yes I'm sure now the liberal majority of the moderators would like to shutdown the counter voice on the issue just as you accuse SDAI of wanting to stifle yours. Funny how you guys don't mind using real strong and confrontational language against Bush, but get prickly when it's used in the return fire. I wrote a long post to Robert which I think sums up the issues. Funny how none of you bothered to address the post pointing out it is a two way street that requires allowing both sides to voice their opinions. You think American political discourse requires dissent, but want to stifle criticism of your side here. BULLSHIT.

Let's review

first off know one was specifically accused of treason. Some of us are trying to debate the issues around what constitutes aiding and abetting terrorists.

Secondly treason is not always a capital crime.

Thirdly accustations are made all the time in the public on a single piece of evidence or gut feel that may not represent a substantial case even in potentially capital crimes. Do you believe Natalie Holloway's mom should stifle it? Do you believe the left should shutup about all the poorly substantiated claims they have against Bush? Or do you think that because he is wrong on so many issues and obviously hand waives away science as it suits him that he deserves whatever he gets?

Regards,
Mark

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (282 posts)