Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to Another example of Eby non-think

So You're Calling Mary Anne A Liar?
Mark Eby — (archived)

She supplied the exact definition I've been using. Want to argue with the librarian go ahead. The crime of treason is not necessarily the same as the definition of treason. There are all kinds of crimes where people can do something similar, but not cross the threshhold requiring or allowing criminal prosecution. Is this concept also over your head? I don't recall Gary's initial comments implying anyone was going to jail.

Al-queda and the insurgents view every drop in Bush's approval ratings on the war as a victory. They know they can't beat our soldiers in battle barring a rare and unlikely event. They know however that all they have to do is win the war of public opinion to defeat us. Does that make us obligated to blindly support the presient? - NO!. But is does make us obligated to judiciously and with good support argue against his policies rather than playing political games based on the usual low accuracy level of political slanders common in our system. even if you feel the war was wrong from the start and unrelated to the war on terror and have a very valid basis for opposing the president you should still base your arguements on well supported facts rather than slanders.

Regards,
Mark

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (282 posts)