Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to Three Way Example of Liberal Group Think

Another example of Eby non-think

Read the law -- it's not that difficult to find on the Web, explained in plain language.

The word treason does not mean what you say it does, not can you make it so by saying it.

You want "push pull style debate"? Try this:

Your "key issue" seems to be: Dissent against American foriegn policy provides encouragement to those that policy has named its enemies.

For my side of this "debate", I will say this: The course of foreign policy pursued by the current Administration has not been changed one iota by public dissent against it, nor by opposition in Congress. I conclude that such dissent -- protected by law, let us never forget -- has been completely ineffectual.

It is therefore necessary for my [sarc]worthy opponent[/sarc] to establish by example that the success of US foreign policy -- specifically, the so-called War on Terror, including but not limited to the armed actions in Afghanistan and Iraq -- has been hampered in any way by alleged "encouragement" derived by the enemy from domestic American dissent.

Facts, Mark. Debate is based on verifiable facts. Faith-based argument -- "I believe this to be true, so all else is false, wrong, evil and sick" -- has no place.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (282 posts)