Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to The Constitution Defines Legal Terms Not The English Lanquage

Legal terms are what we are talking about. Because that is what treason is.

It's pointless to argue this with you anymore because you think you understand this, and you don't. I will try to explain one... more... time...

An act is a crime if one can potentially be convicted of it. Article III, Section 3 clearly defines what the crime of treason is, and then tells what evidence is acceptable to prove the crime and get conviction.

To cry treason is to accuse -- to witness against -- a person. It takes two witnesses to convict, which means that Gary is one and you are two. Since you and Gary apparently have reason to accuse people here of treason, you had better file charges or be found to be accessories, that is, to be giving aid and comfort to the enemy, i.e., the "traitors". Please don't be surprised to find your case dismissed and your butts sued for defamation. Either that, or you can retract and shut up.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (282 posts)